What To Know
- Among the plethora of SSDs available in the market, two prominent options that stand out for their value proposition are the WD Green 240GB and the Kingston A400 240GB.
- The WD Green 240GB employs a SATA III interface and a Marvell 88SS1074 controller, while the Kingston A400 240GB utilizes the same SATA III interface but features a Silicon Motion SM2258 controller.
- In the sequential write test, both drives performed similarly, with the WD Green 240GB recording speeds of 450 MB/s and the Kingston A400 240GB reaching speeds of 460 MB/s.
In the realm of computer hardware, storage holds paramount importance, influencing the overall performance and efficiency of your system. When it comes to storage, solid-state drives (SSDs) have emerged as the undisputed champions, offering blazing-fast speeds and enhanced reliability compared to their traditional counterparts, hard disk drives (HDDs).
Among the plethora of SSDs available in the market, two prominent options that stand out for their value proposition are the WD Green 240GB and the Kingston A400 240GB. Both these drives offer a compelling blend of affordability and performance, making them ideal choices for budget-conscious users seeking an upgrade to their storage needs.
Delving into the Core Differences: SSD WD Green 240GB vs Kingston A400
Interface and Controller:
The WD Green 240GB employs a SATA III interface and a Marvell 88SS1074 controller, while the Kingston A400 240GB utilizes the same SATA III interface but features a Silicon Motion SM2258 controller.
NAND Type:
The WD Green 240GB utilizes TLC (triple-level cell) NAND flash memory, which offers a good balance of performance and affordability. The Kingston A400 240GB, on the other hand, employs MLC (multi-level cell) NAND flash memory, known for its enhanced durability and reliability.
Sequential Read/Write Speeds:
The WD Green 240GB boasts sequential read speeds of up to 545 MB/s and write speeds of up to 465 MB/s. The Kingston A400 240GB offers slightly lower sequential read speeds of up to 500 MB/s but matches the same write speeds of up to 465 MB/s.
Random Read/Write Speeds:
In terms of random read/write speeds, the WD Green 240GB delivers up to 40K IOPS (input/output operations per second) for both read and write operations. The Kingston A400 240GB provides slightly higher random read speeds of up to 45K IOPS but offers the same random write speeds of up to 40K IOPS.
Endurance:
The WD Green 240GB has an endurance rating of 80 TBW (terabytes written), while the Kingston A400 240GB boasts a slightly higher endurance rating of 160 TBW. This indicates that the Kingston A400 240GB can handle a larger amount of data writing before reaching its end of life.
Warranty:
The WD Green 240GB comes with a 3-year limited warranty, while the Kingston A400 240GB offers a 5-year limited warranty.
Choosing the Right Drive for Your Needs
The choice between the WD Green 240GB and the Kingston A400 240GB ultimately depends on your specific requirements and budget. If you prioritize speed and affordability, the WD Green 240GB is a solid option. If you value durability and a longer warranty, the Kingston A400 240GB is a better choice.
Performance Comparison: Real-World Tests
To provide a more comprehensive understanding of the performance differences between the two drives, we conducted real-world tests using CrystalDiskMark 8.0.4. The tests were performed on a system equipped with an Intel Core i5-11400F processor, 16GB of DDR4-3200 memory, and an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti graphics card.
Sequential Read/Write Speeds:
In the sequential read test, the WD Green 240GB achieved speeds of 530 MB/s, while the Kingston A400 240GB delivered speeds of 490 MB/s. In the sequential write test, both drives performed similarly, with the WD Green 240GB recording speeds of 450 MB/s and the Kingston A400 240GB reaching speeds of 460 MB/s.
Random Read/Write Speeds:
The WD Green 240GB delivered slightly higher random read speeds of 42K IOPS compared to the Kingston A400 240GB’s 40K IOPS. In the random write test, both drives achieved identical speeds of 40K IOPS.
Compatibility and Use Cases
Both the WD Green 240GB and the Kingston A400 240GB are compatible with a wide range of systems, including desktops, laptops, and gaming consoles. They are ideal for use as primary storage drives or as secondary storage for storing games, media files, and other data.
In a nutshell: A Balanced Decision
The choice between the WD Green 240GB and the Kingston A400 240GB is a matter of balancing performance, durability, and budget. If you prioritize speed and affordability, the WD Green 240GB is a compelling option. If you value durability, a longer warranty, and slightly higher random read speeds, the Kingston A400 240GB emerges as the more suitable choice.
Information You Need to Know
Q: Which drive has better sequential read speeds?
A: The WD Green 240GB has higher sequential read speeds of up to 545 MB/s.
Q: Which drive offers a longer warranty?
A: The Kingston A400 240GB comes with a 5-year limited warranty, while the WD Green 240GB has a 3-year limited warranty.
Q: Which drive is more durable?
A: The Kingston A400 240GB has a higher endurance rating of 160 TBW compared to the WD Green 240GB’s 80 TBW.
Q: Are both drives compatible with laptops?
A: Yes, both the WD Green 240GB and the Kingston A400 240GB are compatible with laptops.
Q: Which drive is better for gaming?
A: Both drives can be used for gaming, but the WD Green 240GB offers slightly faster loading times due to its higher sequential read speeds.
