What To Know
- Both the Sandisk X400 and the Samsung 860 EVO come in a wide range of capacities, from 120GB to 4TB.
- The Samsung 860 EVO has a longer warranty period (5 years) and a higher endurance rating (240 TBW) compared to the Sandisk X400 (3 years and 120 TBW).
- It offers a longer warranty, higher endurance, and a larger cache, which can provide significant benefits over time, especially for users who frequently write large amounts of data or engage in demanding workloads.
In the realm of solid-state drives (SSDs), two giants stand tall: the Sandisk X400 and the Samsung 860 EVO. Both offer exceptional performance and reliability, but which one reigns supreme? This comprehensive comparison will delve into the intricacies of these two SSDs, exploring their key features, specifications, and benchmarks to determine the victor in this SSD showdown.
Performance: Speed and Responsiveness
Performance is paramount when it comes to SSDs. The Sandisk X400 boasts sequential read and write speeds of up to 550 MB/s and 500 MB/s, respectively. The Samsung 860 EVO, on the other hand, delivers slightly higher speeds of up to 560 MB/s and 530 MB/s for sequential read and write operations. In real-world usage, both SSDs offer lightning-fast boot times, application launches, and file transfers.
Endurance: Longevity and Reliability
Endurance is crucial for SSDs, as it determines their lifespan. The Sandisk X400 has a rated endurance of 120 TBW (terabytes written), while the Samsung 860 EVO offers an impressive 240 TBW. This means that the 860 EVO can withstand twice the amount of data writing before reaching its end of life. For users who frequently write large amounts of data, the 860 EVO provides greater peace of mind.
Capacity: Storage Options
Both the Sandisk X400 and the Samsung 860 EVO come in a wide range of capacities, from 120GB to 4TB. The X400 offers capacities of 120GB, 250GB, 500GB, 1TB, and 2TB, while the 860 EVO is available in 120GB, 250GB, 500GB, 1TB, 2TB, and 4TB options. Users can choose the capacity that best suits their storage needs and budget.
Form Factor: Size and Compatibility
The Sandisk X400 and Samsung 860 EVO both utilize the standard 2.5-inch form factor, making them compatible with most laptops, desktops, and external enclosures. They are also both 7mm thick, which allows for easy installation in thin and compact systems.
Cache: Data Buffering
The Sandisk X400 features a 512MB DRAM cache, while the Samsung 860 EVO comes with a larger 1GB DRAM cache. The cache acts as a buffer, storing frequently accessed data to improve performance. The larger cache size of the 860 EVO provides a slight advantage in handling heavy workloads and multitasking.
Warranty: Peace of Mind
Both Sandisk and Samsung offer generous warranties for their SSDs. The Sandisk X400 comes with a 3-year limited warranty, while the Samsung 860 EVO boasts a 5-year limited warranty. This extended warranty period provides users with added peace of mind and protection against potential hardware failures.
Price and Value: Budget Considerations
The Sandisk X400 is typically priced lower than the Samsung 860 EVO, especially in the smaller capacities. However, the 860 EVO offers better endurance, a larger cache, and a longer warranty. Users who prioritize long-term reliability and performance may be willing to pay a premium for the 860 EVO.
The Verdict: A Clear Winner
After carefully comparing the Sandisk X400 and Samsung 860 EVO, the Samsung 860 EVO emerges as the clear winner. Its superior endurance, larger cache, and longer warranty make it a more compelling choice for users who value reliability and performance. While the Sandisk X400 offers a competitive price, it falls short in terms of endurance and cache size.
What People Want to Know
Q: Which SSD is better for gaming?
A: Both the Sandisk X400 and Samsung 860 EVO offer excellent performance for gaming. However, the 860 EVO’s higher endurance and larger cache may provide a slight advantage in handling demanding games and multitasking.
Q: Which SSD is more reliable?
A: The Samsung 860 EVO has a longer warranty period (5 years) and a higher endurance rating (240 TBW) compared to the Sandisk X400 (3 years and 120 TBW). This makes the 860 EVO a more reliable choice for users who prioritize data longevity.
Q: Is it worth paying more for the Samsung 860 EVO?
A: If you prioritize long-term reliability, performance, and peace of mind, then the Samsung 860 EVO is worth the additional investment. It offers a longer warranty, higher endurance, and a larger cache, which can provide significant benefits over time, especially for users who frequently write large amounts of data or engage in demanding workloads.
