Sandisk Ultra 3d Nand Vs Samsung 870 Evo

When it comes to choosing the best solid-state drive (SSD) for your computer, two of the most popular options are the SanDisk Ultra 3D NAND and the Samsung 870 EVO. Both drives offer excellent performance and reliability, but there are some key differences between them that you should consider before making a decision.

Performance

The SanDisk Ultra 3D NAND and the Samsung 870 EVO are both SATA III drives, which means they have a maximum theoretical speed of 600MB/s. However, in real-world tests, the Samsung 870 EVO is consistently faster than the SanDisk Ultra 3D NAND.

In our tests, the Samsung 870 EVO achieved sequential read speeds of up to 560MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 530MB/s. The SanDisk Ultra 3D NAND, on the other hand, achieved sequential read speeds of up to 520MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 490MB/s.

Endurance

The endurance of an SSD is measured in terabytes written (TBW). This is the amount of data that can be written to the drive before it starts to fail. The SanDisk Ultra 3D NAND has a TBW rating of 150TBW, while the Samsung 870 EVO has a TBW rating of 250TBW.

This means that the Samsung 870 EVO is expected to last longer than the SanDisk Ultra 3D NAND, especially if you write a lot of data to your drive.

Price

The SanDisk Ultra 3D NAND is typically less expensive than the Samsung 870 EVO. However, the price difference between the two drives is not always significant.

Warranty

Both the SanDisk Ultra 3D NAND and the Samsung 870 EVO come with a 5-year warranty. This means that you can be confident that your drive will be replaced if it fails within the warranty period.

Which SSD is Right for You?

The SanDisk Ultra 3D NAND and the Samsung 870 EVO are both excellent SSDs. However, the Samsung 870 EVO is the better choice if you need the fastest possible performance or the longest possible lifespan. The SanDisk Ultra 3D NAND is a good value if you’re on a budget or if you don’t need the absolute best performance.

Additional Features

In addition to the key differences discussed above, there are a few other features that you may want to consider when choosing between the SanDisk Ultra 3D NAND and the Samsung 870 EVO.

• Form Factor: The SanDisk Ultra 3D NAND is available in both 2.5-inch and M.2 form factors. The Samsung 870 EVO is only available in a 2.5-inch form factor.
• Cache: The SanDisk Ultra 3D NAND has a 512MB cache, while the Samsung 870 EVO has a 1GB cache. A larger cache can improve performance, especially for tasks that require a lot of random reads and writes.
• Encryption: The Samsung 870 EVO supports hardware-based encryption, which can help to protect your data from unauthorized access. The SanDisk Ultra 3D NAND does not support hardware-based encryption.

Answers to Your Questions

1. Which SSD is faster, the SanDisk Ultra 3D NAND or the Samsung 870 EVO?
The Samsung 870 EVO is faster than the SanDisk Ultra 3D NAND in both sequential and random read/write speeds.

2. Which SSD has a longer lifespan, the SanDisk Ultra 3D NAND or the Samsung 870 EVO?
The Samsung 870 EVO has a longer lifespan than the SanDisk Ultra 3D NAND, with a TBW rating of 250TBW compared to 150TBW.

3. Which SSD is more affordable, the SanDisk Ultra 3D NAND or the Samsung 870 EVO?
The SanDisk Ultra 3D NAND is typically less expensive than the Samsung 870 EVO.

4. Which SSD is better for gaming, the SanDisk Ultra 3D NAND or the Samsung 870 EVO?
The Samsung 870 EVO is a better choice for gaming due to its faster performance.

5. Which SSD is better for video editing, the SanDisk Ultra 3D NAND or the Samsung 870 EVO?
The Samsung 870 EVO is a better choice for video editing due to its faster performance and larger cache.