What To Know
- Both the 870 QVO and 870 EVO are rated for high endurance, but the 870 EVO has a slight advantage.
- On the other hand, the 870 QVO is a more budget-friendly option that offers a solid balance of performance and affordability.
- The 870 EVO is the superior option for power users who prioritize performance and endurance, while the 870 QVO is a more affordable choice for general-purpose computing.
When it comes to choosing the right storage solution for your computer, Samsung’s SATA SSDs are a reliable and high-performing option. In this blog post, we will delve into the details of the Samsung SATA SSD 870 QVO and 870 EVO, comparing their key features, performance, and suitability for different use cases. By understanding the differences between these two drives, you can make an informed decision that best meets your storage needs.
Performance: Speed and Responsiveness
One of the most critical factors to consider when choosing an SSD is its performance. Both the 870 QVO and 870 EVO offer excellent read and write speeds, but there are some subtle differences to note.
The 870 EVO boasts faster sequential read speeds of up to 560 MB/s compared to the 870 QVO’s 550 MB/s. This means that the 870 EVO can retrieve data from the drive slightly faster, which can be beneficial for tasks such as loading applications or opening large files.
In terms of sequential write speeds, the 870 EVO again takes the lead with speeds of up to 530 MB/s against the 870 QVO’s 520 MB/s. This difference is less noticeable for most users, but it can be a factor for those who frequently write large amounts of data to their SSD.
Endurance and Reliability
Endurance refers to the amount of data that can be written to an SSD before it fails. Both the 870 QVO and 870 EVO are rated for high endurance, but the 870 EVO has a slight advantage.
The 870 EVO is rated for up to 2,400 TBW (Terabytes Written), while the 870 QVO is rated for up to 1,800 TBW. This means that the 870 EVO can handle more intensive write workloads and is more suitable for use in high-demand applications.
Cache and Memory
The cache and memory of an SSD play a significant role in its overall performance. The 870 EVO features a larger cache size of 64 MB compared to the 870 QVO’s 32 MB. A larger cache allows the SSD to store more frequently accessed data, reducing the need to access the slower NAND flash memory.
Additionally, the 870 EVO utilizes faster LPDDR4 memory, while the 870 QVO uses DDR4 memory. LPDDR4 memory offers higher bandwidth and lower power consumption, which can contribute to improved performance.
Technology: TLC vs QLC
One of the key differences between the 870 QVO and 870 EVO lies in the type of flash memory they use. The 870 QVO employs QLC (Quad-Level Cell) technology, while the 870 EVO uses TLC (Triple-Level Cell) technology.
QLC technology stores four bits of data per memory cell, while TLC stores three bits. While QLC offers higher storage density and lower cost per gigabyte, it also comes with some performance drawbacks.
Suitability for Different Use Cases
Based on their performance characteristics, the 870 QVO and 870 EVO are suitable for different use cases.
The 870 EVO is ideal for users who require maximum performance for demanding applications such as video editing, gaming, or workstation computing. Its faster speeds and higher endurance make it the preferred choice for power users who handle large amounts of data and require reliable storage.
On the other hand, the 870 QVO is a more budget-friendly option that offers a solid balance of performance and affordability. It is suitable for general-purpose computing, including web browsing, office applications, and casual gaming.
Pricing and Availability
The pricing of the 870 QVO and 870 EVO varies depending on the capacity and availability in different regions. However, the 870 QVO is generally priced lower than the 870 EVO due to its use of QLC technology.
Both drives are widely available from various retailers and online marketplaces.
Key Points: Making an Informed Decision
Choosing between the Samsung SATA SSD 870 QVO and 870 EVO depends on your specific storage needs and budget. The 870 EVO is the superior option for power users who prioritize performance and endurance, while the 870 QVO is a more affordable choice for general-purpose computing. By carefully considering the differences outlined in this comparison, you can make an informed decision that meets your storage requirements and provides the best value for your money.
Frequently Discussed Topics
Q: Which drive has a longer warranty?
A: Both the 870 QVO and 870 EVO come with a 5-year limited warranty.
Q: Can I use the 870 QVO for gaming?
A: Yes, you can use the 870 QVO for gaming, but it may not provide the same level of performance as the 870 EVO for demanding games.
Q: Which drive is more energy-efficient?
A: The 870 QVO consumes less power than the 870 EVO due to its use of QLC technology.
Q: Can I use the 870 QVO as a boot drive?
A: Yes, both the 870 QVO and 870 EVO can be used as boot drives for your operating system and applications.
Q: Which drive is better for storing large video files?
A: The 870 EVO is a better choice for storing large video files due to its faster write speeds and higher endurance.
