What To Know
- The 870 QVO has a TBW rating of 300TBW for the 1TB model and 600TBW for the 2TB model.
- The Ultra 3D, however, has a lower TBW rating of 200TBW for the 1TB model and 400TBW for the 2TB model.
- The Samsung 870 QVO has better endurance than the SanDisk Ultra 3D, with a TBW rating of 300TBW for the 1TB model and 600TBW for the 2TB model.
In today’s digital world, solid-state drives (SSDs) have become essential for improving the performance and responsiveness of computers. With numerous options available, choosing the right SSD can be a daunting task. Two of the most popular choices are the Samsung 870 QVO and the SanDisk Ultra 3D. In this comprehensive guide, we will compare the key features, performance, and value of these two top-rated SSDs to help you make an informed decision.
Performance: Speed and Endurance
One of the most crucial factors to consider when choosing an SSD is its performance. Both the Samsung 870 QVO and SanDisk Ultra 3D offer impressive speeds. The 870 QVO boasts sequential read and write speeds of up to 560MB/s and 530MB/s, respectively. The Ultra 3D, on the other hand, offers slightly faster speeds of 560MB/s read and 535MB/s write.
Endurance, measured in terabytes written (TBW), indicates how much data can be written to an SSD before it wears out. The 870 QVO has a TBW rating of 300TBW for the 1TB model and 600TBW for the 2TB model. The Ultra 3D, however, has a lower TBW rating of 200TBW for the 1TB model and 400TBW for the 2TB model. This means that the 870 QVO is more durable and can handle heavier workloads.
Capacity and Form Factor
Capacity is another important consideration when choosing an SSD. Both the 870 QVO and Ultra 3D are available in various capacities, including 1TB, 2TB, and 4TB. The 870 QVO also offers an 8TB capacity option.
In terms of form factor, both SSDs use the standard 2.5-inch SATA interface. This makes them compatible with most laptops and desktops. However, the Ultra 3D also comes in an M.2 form factor, which provides a more compact and efficient solution for smaller devices.
Technology: QLC vs TLC
One of the key differences between the 870 QVO and Ultra 3D lies in the type of flash memory they use. The 870 QVO utilizes Quad-Level Cell (QLC) technology, which stores four bits of data per cell. This allows for higher capacities at a lower cost. However, QLC is also slower and less durable than Triple-Level Cell (TLC) technology.
The Ultra 3D, on the other hand, uses TLC technology, which stores three bits of data per cell. TLC is faster and more durable than QLC but also more expensive.
Power Consumption and Warranty
Power consumption is an important factor to consider for laptops and other portable devices. The 870 QVO has a slightly higher power consumption than the Ultra 3D, consuming up to 2.2W during active use. The Ultra 3D, on the other hand, consumes up to 1.8W.
Both the 870 QVO and Ultra 3D come with a limited warranty. The 870 QVO offers a three-year warranty, while the Ultra 3D offers a five-year warranty.
Price and Value
When it comes to price, the 870 QVO is generally more affordable than the Ultra 3D. The 1TB model of the 870 QVO costs around $100, while the 1TB model of the Ultra 3D costs around $120.
In terms of value, the 870 QVO offers a better bang for your buck. It provides higher capacities, better endurance, and a lower price point. However, if you need the fastest speeds and the most reliable performance, the Ultra 3D is the better choice.
Which SSD is Right for You?
The choice between the Samsung 870 QVO and SanDisk Ultra 3D ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. If you’re looking for a reliable, affordable SSD with high capacities and good endurance, the 870 QVO is an excellent choice. However, if you prioritize speed, durability, and a longer warranty, the Ultra 3D is the better option.
Popular Questions
1. Which SSD is faster, the Samsung 870 QVO or SanDisk Ultra 3D?
The SanDisk Ultra 3D offers slightly faster speeds than the Samsung 870 QVO.
2. Which SSD has better endurance, the Samsung 870 QVO or SanDisk Ultra 3D?
The Samsung 870 QVO has better endurance than the SanDisk Ultra 3D, with a TBW rating of 300TBW for the 1TB model and 600TBW for the 2TB model.
3. Which SSD is more affordable, the Samsung 870 QVO or SanDisk Ultra 3D?
The Samsung 870 QVO is generally more affordable than the SanDisk Ultra 3D.
4. Which SSD comes with a longer warranty, the Samsung 870 QVO or SanDisk Ultra 3D?
The SanDisk Ultra 3D comes with a longer warranty than the Samsung 870 QVO, offering a five-year warranty compared to the three-year warranty on the 870 QVO.
5. Which SSD is better for gaming, the Samsung 870 QVO or SanDisk Ultra 3D?
Both the Samsung 870 QVO and SanDisk Ultra 3D are suitable for gaming. However, the Ultra 3D with its faster speeds and lower latency may provide a slight advantage in gaming performance.
