What To Know
- In the realm of budget-friendly graphics cards, the AMD Radeon R7 250 and Intel UHD 630 stand out as two compelling options for gamers seeking a balance between performance and affordability.
- Both the Radeon R7 250 and UHD 630 feature 2GB of GDDR5 memory, but the R7 250 has a higher memory bandwidth of 128GB/s compared to 64GB/s for the UHD 630.
- However, if you are on a tight budget or prefer the convenience of an integrated GPU, the UHD 630 provides a reasonable level of performance for casual gaming.
In the realm of budget-friendly graphics cards, the AMD Radeon R7 250 and Intel UHD 630 stand out as two compelling options for gamers seeking a balance between performance and affordability. This comprehensive comparison delves into the key aspects of these graphics processors, providing insights into their strengths, weaknesses, and suitability for various gaming scenarios.
Architecture and Specifications
The Radeon R7 250 is based on AMD’s GCN 1.0 architecture, featuring 384 stream processors and a clock speed of 1050MHz. On the other hand, the UHD 630 is integrated into Intel’s 8th and 9th generation processors and employs the Gen9 architecture with 24 execution units and a higher clock speed of 1150MHz.
Performance Comparison
In terms of raw performance, the Radeon R7 250 holds a significant advantage over the UHD 630. In benchmark tests, the R7 250 consistently delivers higher frame rates in games at low to medium settings. However, the UHD 630’s higher clock speed allows it to perform better in certain games that are less demanding on the GPU.
Memory and Bandwidth
Both the Radeon R7 250 and UHD 630 feature 2GB of GDDR5 memory, but the R7 250 has a higher memory bandwidth of 128GB/s compared to 64GB/s for the UHD 630. This difference becomes noticeable in games that require large textures or high-resolution rendering.
Power Consumption and Heat Output
The Radeon R7 250 has a higher power consumption of 65W compared to the UHD 630’s 15W. This means that the R7 250 will require a more robust power supply and may generate more heat, requiring better cooling solutions.
Features and Support
The Radeon R7 250 supports DirectX 12, OpenGL 4.5, and AMD Eyefinity technology for multi-monitor setups. The UHD 630 supports DirectX 12 and OpenGL 4.5, but lacks Eyefinity support. Both GPUs offer basic video decoding and encoding features.
Suitability for Different Games
The Radeon R7 250 is a better choice for gamers who play demanding titles at low to medium settings. It can handle games such as Fortnite, Overwatch, and Rocket League with decent frame rates. The UHD 630 is more suited for casual gamers who play less demanding games or are willing to sacrifice some graphical detail for smoother performance.
Takeaways: The Verdict
The choice between the Radeon R7 250 and UHD 630 ultimately depends on your specific gaming needs and budget. If you prioritize raw performance and are willing to invest in a dedicated graphics card, the R7 250 is the better option. However, if you are on a tight budget or prefer the convenience of an integrated GPU, the UHD 630 provides a reasonable level of performance for casual gaming.
Information You Need to Know
Q: Which GPU is more power-efficient?
A: The UHD 630 has a lower power consumption of 15W compared to the R7 250’s 65W.
Q: Does the R7 250 support multi-monitor setups?
A: Yes, the R7 250 supports AMD Eyefinity technology, allowing for multi-monitor configurations.
Q: Which GPU is better for casual gaming?
A: The UHD 630 is more suitable for casual gamers who play less demanding games or are willing to sacrifice some graphical detail for smoother performance.
Q: Does the UHD 630 support DirectX 12?
A: Yes, both the R7 250 and UHD 630 support DirectX 12.
Q: Which GPU is better for video editing?
A: Neither the R7 250 nor the UHD 630 are ideal for video editing, as they are primarily designed for gaming.
