Fixing, upgrading and optimizing PCs
Guide

Radeon R7 240 Vs Uhd 630

Michael is the owner and chief editor of MichaelPCGuy.com. He has over 15 years of experience fixing, upgrading, and optimizing personal computers. Michael started his career working as a computer technician at a local repair shop where he learned invaluable skills for hardware and software troubleshooting. In his free time,...

What To Know

  • In the realm of budget-friendly graphics, the Radeon R7 240 from AMD and the UHD 630 from Intel are two prominent choices.
  • In the realm of gaming, the R7 240 delivers a slightly superior performance compared to the UHD 630, particularly in older titles.
  • However, if gaming performance is a top priority and budget is a primary concern, the Radeon R7 240 remains a viable option.

The world of graphics processing units (GPUs) is a competitive battleground, where AMD and Intel stand as formidable contenders. In the realm of budget-friendly graphics, the Radeon R7 240 from AMD and the UHD 630 from Intel are two prominent choices. However, the question remains: which one reigns supreme? In this comprehensive analysis, we delve into the depths of these graphics cards, comparing their features, performance, and value to uncover the ultimate victor.

Architecture and Technology

The Radeon R7 240 boasts the GCN 1.0 architecture, featuring 320 stream processors and a 64-bit memory bus. On the other hand, the UHD 630 utilizes Intel‘s Gen9 LP architecture, equipped with 24 execution units and a 128-bit memory bus.

Performance: Gaming and Beyond

In the realm of gaming, the R7 240 delivers a slightly superior performance compared to the UHD 630, particularly in older titles. However, for more demanding games, both cards struggle to maintain playable frame rates at high resolutions.

Beyond gaming, the UHD 630 excels in media playback and video encoding tasks, thanks to its dedicated media engine and hardware acceleration support. The R7 240, while capable, falls short in this aspect.

Memory and Bandwidth

The R7 240 comes with 2GB of GDDR5 memory clocked at 900MHz, providing a bandwidth of 28.8GB/s. The UHD 630 offers 2GB of DDR4 memory running at 2133MHz, resulting in a bandwidth of 34.1GB/s. While the UHD 630 has a higher bandwidth, the R7 240’s GDDR5 memory offers faster speeds.

Power Consumption and Heat Dissipation

The Radeon R7 240 consumes around 50W of power, while the UHD 630 requires a mere 15W. This significant difference in power consumption translates to lower operating temperatures and reduced noise levels for the UHD 630.

Features and Compatibility

Both the R7 240 and UHD 630 support DirectX 12 and OpenGL 4.5. However, the R7 240 offers additional features such as AMD Eyefinity technology for multi-monitor setups and AMD PowerTune technology for dynamic power management.

Value and Price

The Radeon R7 240 is typically priced lower than the UHD 630, making it a more budget-friendly option. However, the UHD 630 offers better value for money considering its superior media playback capabilities and lower power consumption.

Verdict: The Ultimate Champion

After meticulously comparing the Radeon R7 240 and UHD 630, we conclude that the UHD 630 emerges as the victor. Its superior media playback capabilities, lower power consumption, and higher memory bandwidth make it the more well-rounded choice for users seeking a balanced graphics solution.

However, if gaming performance is a top priority and budget is a primary concern, the Radeon R7 240 remains a viable option. It delivers slightly better gaming performance at a lower price point.

Basics You Wanted To Know

Q1. Which card has better gaming performance?
A1. The Radeon R7 240 offers slightly better gaming performance in older titles, while both cards struggle with demanding games.

Q2. Which card is more power-efficient?
A2. The UHD 630 consumes significantly less power than the R7 240, resulting in lower operating temperatures and reduced noise levels.

Q3. Which card offers better media playback capabilities?
A3. The UHD 630 excels in media playback and video encoding tasks due to its dedicated media engine and hardware acceleration support.

Was this page helpful?

Michael

Michael is the owner and chief editor of MichaelPCGuy.com. He has over 15 years of experience fixing, upgrading, and optimizing personal computers. Michael started his career working as a computer technician at a local repair shop where he learned invaluable skills for hardware and software troubleshooting. In his free time, Michael enjoys tinkering with computers and staying on top of the latest tech innovations. He launched MichaelPCGuy.com to share his knowledge with others and help them get the most out of their PCs. Whether someone needs virus removal, a hardware upgrade, or tips for better performance, Michael is here to help solve any computer issues. When he's not working on computers, Michael likes playing video games and spending time with his family. He believes the proper maintenance and care is key to keeping a PC running smoothly for many years. Michael is committed to providing straightforward solutions and guidance to readers of his blog. If you have a computer problem, MichaelPCGuy.com is the place to find an answer.
Back to top button