What To Know
- The Kingston SSD KC600 offers an endurance of 600 TBW (Terabytes Written), while the Samsung 870 EVO boasts an endurance of 1,500 TBW.
- The Samsung 870 EVO has a higher endurance rating of 1,500 TBW compared to the KC600’s 600 TBW, indicating a longer lifespan for write-intensive workloads.
- The Kingston SSD KC600 is the better choice for gaming due to its superior sequential and random read/write speeds, which result in faster loading times and improved overall performance.
In the realm of storage devices, Kingston’s SSD KC600 and Samsung’s 870 EVO stand out as two formidable contenders. As NVMe and SATA SSDs respectively, they offer distinct advantages and drawbacks. This comprehensive guide will delve into a detailed comparison of the Kingston SSD KC600 vs Samsung 870 EVO, examining their performance, features, and value proposition.
Performance
Sequential Read/Write Speeds
The Kingston SSD KC600 boasts impressive sequential read/write speeds of up to 3,500/2,900 MB/s, thanks to its NVMe interface. In contrast, the Samsung 870 EVO, being a SATA SSD, offers sequential read/write speeds of up to 560/530 MB/s. This significant difference in speed is evident in tasks involving large file transfers or loading demanding applications.
Random Read/Write Speeds
Random read/write speeds are crucial for everyday operations like browsing the web or working with small files. The Kingston SSD KC600 excels in this area as well, with random read/write speeds of up to 300,000/250,000 IOPS. The Samsung 870 EVO, on the other hand, offers random read/write speeds of up to 98,000/88,000 IOPS.
Features
NVMe vs SATA Interface
The most significant difference between the Kingston SSD KC600 and Samsung 870 EVO lies in their interfaces. The KC600 utilizes the NVMe (Non-Volatile Memory Express) interface, which enables direct communication with the PCIe bus. This results in significantly faster data transfer speeds compared to the SATA interface used by the 870 EVO.
Form Factor
The Kingston SSD KC600 comes in a compact M.2 2280 form factor, which is ideal for laptops and other space-constrained systems. The Samsung 870 EVO, on the other hand, is available in both 2.5-inch and M.2 2280 form factors, providing greater flexibility for different system configurations.
Endurance
Endurance refers to the amount of data that can be written to an SSD before it fails. The Kingston SSD KC600 offers an endurance of 600 TBW (Terabytes Written), while the Samsung 870 EVO boasts an endurance of 1,500 TBW. This indicates that the 870 EVO is more suitable for write-intensive workloads.
Value Proposition
Pricing
The Kingston SSD KC600 is generally priced lower than the Samsung 870 EVO, especially for higher capacities. This makes the KC600 a more budget-friendly option for users looking for a fast and reliable NVMe SSD.
Warranty
Both the Kingston SSD KC600 and Samsung 870 EVO come with a 5-year warranty, providing peace of mind for users.
Use Cases
Kingston SSD KC600
- Ideal for gaming, video editing, and other demanding applications
- Suitable for performance-oriented systems where speed is paramount
- Recommended for users seeking a cost-effective NVMe SSD
Samsung 870 EVO
- Excellent choice for everyday use, including web browsing, office productivity, and light gaming
- Suitable for both laptops and desktops with SATA interfaces
- Recommended for users prioritizing durability and write endurance
The Bottom Line: The Right Choice for Your Needs
The choice between the Kingston SSD KC600 and Samsung 870 EVO ultimately depends on your specific requirements. If you prioritize raw speed and performance, the KC600 is the clear winner. However, if you value durability, wide compatibility, and a more balanced approach, the 870 EVO may be a better fit.
What You Need to Know
Q: Which SSD is faster, the KC600 or the 870 EVO?
A: The Kingston SSD KC600 offers significantly faster sequential and random read/write speeds than the Samsung 870 EVO due to its NVMe interface.
Q: Which SSD has a longer lifespan?
A: The Samsung 870 EVO has a higher endurance rating of 1,500 TBW compared to the KC600’s 600 TBW, indicating a longer lifespan for write-intensive workloads.
Q: Which SSD is better for gaming?
A: The Kingston SSD KC600 is the better choice for gaming due to its superior sequential and random read/write speeds, which result in faster loading times and improved overall performance.
