What To Know
- The EVO 870 boasts sequential read and write speeds of up to 560 MB/s and 530 MB/s, respectively, while the A400 offers speeds of up to 500 MB/s and 450 MB/s.
- In terms of endurance, the Samsung EVO 870 has a higher Total Bytes Written (TBW) rating compared to the Kingston A400.
- The EVO 870’s TBW rating ranges from 150TB for the 120GB model to 1200TB for the 1TB model, while the A400’s TBW rating ranges from 80TB for the 120GB model to 480TB for the 480GB model.
In today’s fast-paced digital world, storage speed is paramount for seamless computing experiences. Solid State Drives (SSDs) have revolutionized the storage game, offering blazing-fast speeds compared to traditional Hard Disk Drives (HDDs). Among the budget-friendly SSD options, the Kingston A400 and Samsung EVO 870 stand out as top contenders. In this comprehensive guide, we will put these two popular SSDs head-to-head, examining their key features, performance, reliability, and more, to help you make an informed decision for your storage needs.
Performance: Speed and Responsiveness
When it comes to performance, the Samsung EVO 870 takes a clear lead over the Kingston A400. The EVO 870 boasts sequential read and write speeds of up to 560 MB/s and 530 MB/s, respectively, while the A400 offers speeds of up to 500 MB/s and 450 MB/s. This difference in speed translates to noticeable improvements in loading times for applications, games, and files.
Capacity and Endurance
Both the Kingston A400 and Samsung EVO 870 are available in a range of capacities, from 120GB to 1TB. However, the A400 offers a wider selection of capacities, including 240GB and 480GB options, while the EVO 870 only comes in 120GB, 250GB, 500GB, and 1TB capacities.
In terms of endurance, the Samsung EVO 870 has a higher Total Bytes Written (TBW) rating compared to the Kingston A400. The EVO 870’s TBW rating ranges from 150TB for the 120GB model to 1200TB for the 1TB model, while the A400’s TBW rating ranges from 80TB for the 120GB model to 480TB for the 480GB model. This indicates that the EVO 870 is designed to handle more data writes over its lifetime.
NAND Type and Controller
The Kingston A400 uses TLC (Triple-Level Cell) NAND, while the Samsung EVO 870 uses MLC (Multi-Level Cell) NAND. MLC NAND offers better performance and endurance compared to TLC NAND, but it is also more expensive. The EVO 870 also features a more advanced controller than the A400, which contributes to its superior performance.
Warranty and Reliability
Both the Kingston A400 and Samsung EVO 870 come with a 5-year limited warranty, providing peace of mind for users. However, the EVO 870 has a more established track record of reliability, with numerous positive reviews and industry accolades.
Price and Value
The Kingston A400 is typically priced lower than the Samsung EVO 870, making it a more budget-friendly option. However, the EVO 870 offers better performance, endurance, and reliability, making it a better value for users who prioritize these factors.
Which SSD is Right for You?
The choice between the Kingston A400 and Samsung EVO 870 depends on your individual needs and budget. If you are looking for a budget-friendly SSD with decent performance, the Kingston A400 is a solid choice. However, if you prioritize speed, endurance, and reliability, the Samsung EVO 870 is the better option, despite its slightly higher price.
Takeaways: The Winner
In the battle of the budget SSDs, the Samsung EVO 870 emerges as the clear winner. Its superior performance, endurance, and reliability make it the better choice for users who demand the best from their storage devices. While the Kingston A400 offers a more budget-friendly option, it falls short in terms of performance and durability. Ultimately, the decision depends on your individual needs and budget, but the Samsung EVO 870 is the overall better choice for most users.
Answers to Your Most Common Questions
Q: Which SSD has faster read speeds, the Kingston A400 or Samsung EVO 870?
A: The Samsung EVO 870 has faster read speeds of up to 560 MB/s compared to the Kingston A400’s 500 MB/s.
Q: Which SSD has a higher TBW rating?
A: The Samsung EVO 870 has a higher TBW rating, indicating better endurance than the Kingston A400.
Q: Which SSD uses MLC NAND?
A: The Samsung EVO 870 uses MLC NAND, while the Kingston A400 uses TLC NAND. MLC NAND offers better performance and endurance than TLC NAND.
