What To Know
- This comprehensive guide will delve into the specifications, performance, and suitability of the Intel Xeon W3690 vs X5690, empowering you to select the ideal processor for your workstation needs.
- This is because the X5690 has a higher multiplier, allowing for more flexibility in overclocking.
- However, if you seek a balance of performance, overclocking potential, and cost, the X5690 is a compelling option.
When it comes to high-performance workstations, the choice of processor is crucial. Two prominent options from Intel are the Xeon W3690 and the X5690. Both processors offer exceptional capabilities, but understanding their key differences is essential for making an informed decision. This comprehensive guide will delve into the specifications, performance, and suitability of the Intel Xeon W3690 vs X5690, empowering you to select the ideal processor for your workstation needs.
Processor Specifications
| Feature | Intel Xeon W3690 | Intel Xeon X5690 |
| — | — | — |
| Socket | LGA 1366 | LGA 1366 |
| Core Count | 6 | 6 |
| Thread Count | 12 | 12 |
| Base Clock Speed | 3.46 GHz | 3.46 GHz |
| Turbo Boost Speed | 3.8 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Cache Size | 12 MB L3 | 12 MB L3 |
| TDP | 130W | 130W |
Performance Comparison
Single-Core Performance
In single-core applications, both processors perform at similar levels due to their identical clock speeds. However, the W3690 may have a slight edge in some scenarios due to its slightly higher base clock speed.
Multi-Core Performance
For multi-core applications, the W3690 and X5690 offer comparable performance. Both processors have 6 cores and 12 threads, enabling them to handle demanding workloads efficiently.
Overclocking Potential
The X5690 has a slightly higher overclocking potential compared to the W3690. This is because the X5690 has a higher multiplier, allowing for more flexibility in overclocking.
Features and Capabilities
Hyper-Threading
Both processors support Hyper-Threading technology, which allows each physical core to process two threads simultaneously. This feature significantly improves multi-tasking capabilities.
Virtualization Support
The W3690 and X5690 both support Intel Virtualization Technology (VT-x), enabling them to run multiple operating systems and applications simultaneously.
Error Correction Code (ECC) Support
The W3690 supports ECC memory, which detects and corrects memory errors. This feature is crucial for mission-critical applications where data integrity is paramount.
Suitability
Content Creation
Both processors are well-suited for content creation tasks such as video editing, 3D rendering, and animation. The W3690 may have a slight advantage in applications that benefit from ECC memory.
Scientific Computing
The W3690 and X5690 are capable of handling scientific computing workloads. However, the W3690’s ECC memory support makes it a more suitable choice for applications that require high data accuracy.
Workstation Applications
The X5690 is an excellent choice for general workstation applications due to its higher overclocking potential and lower price point. The W3690 is a better option for mission-critical applications that require ECC memory.
Recommendations: Choosing the Right Processor
The choice between the Intel Xeon W3690 and X5690 depends on your specific workstation requirements. If you prioritize data integrity and ECC memory support, the W3690 is the ideal choice. However, if you seek a balance of performance, overclocking potential, and cost, the X5690 is a compelling option.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q1: Which processor has better single-core performance?
A1: Both processors perform similarly in single-core applications due to their identical clock speeds.
Q2: Is the W3690 worth the extra cost over the X5690?
A2: The W3690 offers ECC memory support, which is crucial for mission-critical applications. If you require this feature, the W3690 is worth the investment.
Q3: Which processor is better for overclocking?
A3: The X5690 has a higher overclocking potential due to its higher multiplier.
