Intel Ssd 320 Vs. Samsung 850 Evo: The Ultimate Showdown
What To Know
- The Intel SSD 320 offers a TBW rating of 80 for the 240GB model, while the Samsung 850 EVO provides a significantly higher TBW rating of 150 for the same capacity.
- The Samsung 850 EVO, on the other hand, features Samsung’s TurboWrite technology, which dynamically allocates a portion of the drive as a write buffer to enhance performance.
- The Intel SSD 320 has a TBW rating of 80 for the 240GB model, while the Samsung 850 EVO has a TBW rating of 150 for the same capacity.
In the realm of solid-state drives (SSDs), two giants stand out: Intel and Samsung. Their iconic models, the Intel SSD 320 and Samsung 850 EVO, have long been the subject of comparisons among tech enthusiasts. In this comprehensive blog post, we will delve into the depths of these two SSDs, analyzing their key features, performance, and overall value to help you make an informed decision.
Performance: Speed and Responsiveness
The Intel SSD 320 boasts impressive read speeds of up to 500 MB/s and write speeds of up to 450 MB/s. However, the Samsung 850 EVO outperforms it with lightning-fast read speeds of up to 540 MB/s and write speeds of up to 520 MB/s. This difference is particularly noticeable in demanding applications that require swift data access.
Endurance: Durability and Longevity
Solid-state drives have a limited lifespan measured in terms of terabytes written (TBW). The Intel SSD 320 offers a TBW rating of 80 for the 240GB model, while the Samsung 850 EVO provides a significantly higher TBW rating of 150 for the same capacity. This means that the Samsung 850 EVO is more durable and can withstand a higher workload over its lifetime.
Features: Advanced Technologies
The Intel SSD 320 comes equipped with Intel’s Smart Response Technology, which utilizes a small portion of the SSD as a cache to accelerate hard drive performance. The Samsung 850 EVO, on the other hand, features Samsung’s TurboWrite technology, which dynamically allocates a portion of the drive as a write buffer to enhance performance.
Compatibility: Hardware and Software
Both the Intel SSD 320 and Samsung 850 EVO are widely compatible with various hardware configurations. They support SATA III interfaces and are compatible with most motherboards and operating systems. However, the Samsung 850 EVO has a slight edge in compatibility, as it also supports NVMe interfaces on certain models.
Price and Value: Bang for Your Buck
The Intel SSD 320 is generally priced lower than the Samsung 850 EVO, making it a more budget-friendly option. However, the Samsung 850 EVO offers superior performance, endurance, and features, making it the better value for those seeking the best possible SSD experience.
Final Note: The Ultimate Choice
The choice between the Intel SSD 320 and Samsung 850 EVO ultimately depends on your individual needs and budget. If affordability is your primary concern, the Intel SSD 320 is a solid choice. However, if you prioritize performance, durability, and advanced features, the Samsung 850 EVO is the clear winner.
Popular Questions
1. Which SSD is faster for gaming?
The Samsung 850 EVO’s faster read and write speeds make it the better choice for gaming, as it can reduce load times and improve overall gameplay performance.
2. What is the difference between TLC and MLC NAND flash?
TLC (triple-level cell) NAND flash stores 3 bits per cell, while MLC (multi-level cell) NAND flash stores 2 bits per cell. TLC has higher density and lower cost, but MLC has better endurance and performance.
3. How long will these SSDs last?
The lifespan of an SSD depends on its TBW rating and usage patterns. The Intel SSD 320 has a TBW rating of 80 for the 240GB model, while the Samsung 850 EVO has a TBW rating of 150 for the same capacity. Proper use and maintenance can extend their lifespan.