What To Know
- In terms of performance, the Intel Celeron Quad Core N5100 holds a slight edge over the N4020.
- These benchmarks indicate that the N5100 outperforms the N4020 in both single-core and multi-core tasks, making it a more suitable choice for multitasking and demanding applications.
- Both the N5100 and N4020 feature integrated Intel UHD Graphics, but the N4020 has the advantage of supporting more advanced features such as DirectX 12 and OpenGL 4.
The Intel Celeron brand has long been synonymous with budget-friendly computing, offering a balance of affordability and performance. In the realm of quad-core processors, the Intel Celeron Quad Core N5100 and N4020 stand out as two popular options. This comprehensive comparison will delve into their key specifications, performance benchmarks, and use cases to help you make an informed decision.
Specifications Comparison
| Feature | Intel Celeron Quad Core N5100 | Intel Celeron Quad Core N4020 |
| — | — | — |
| Cores | 4 | 4 |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base Clock Speed | 1.1 GHz | 1.1 GHz |
| Turbo Boost Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| Cache | 4 MB L3 | 4 MB L3 |
| TDP | 6W | 6W |
| Integrated Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
| Process Technology | 10nm | 14nm |
Performance Benchmarks
In terms of performance, the Intel Celeron Quad Core N5100 holds a slight edge over the N4020. The following benchmark results demonstrate their relative capabilities:
- Geekbench 5 Single-Core: N5100: 550, N4020: 480
- Geekbench 5 Multi-Core: N5100: 1680, N4020: 1520
- Cinebench R23 Single-Core: N5100: 950, N4020: 800
- Cinebench R23 Multi-Core: N5100: 2800, N4020: 2400
These benchmarks indicate that the N5100 outperforms the N4020 in both single-core and multi-core tasks, making it a more suitable choice for multitasking and demanding applications.
Integrated Graphics Comparison
Both the N5100 and N4020 feature integrated Intel UHD Graphics, but the N4020 has the advantage of supporting more advanced features such as DirectX 12 and OpenGL 4.5. This makes the N4020 slightly better suited for light gaming and video editing.
Power Consumption and Thermal Performance
Both processors have a TDP of 6W, which translates to low power consumption and excellent thermal performance. They are well-suited for use in laptops, tablets, and other devices that prioritize battery life.
Use Cases
The Intel Celeron Quad Core N5100 and N4020 are suitable for a wide range of use cases, including:
- General Computing: Web browsing, email, office productivity
- Multimedia: Video streaming, music playback
- Light Gaming: Casual titles, indie games
- Basic Image Editing: Photo cropping, resizing
- Home Automation: Control devices, manage smart home systems
Which Processor is Right for You?
The choice between the Intel Celeron Quad Core N5100 and N4020 depends on your specific needs and budget.
- If you prioritize performance for multitasking and demanding applications, the N5100 is the better option.
- If you want slightly better integrated graphics and support for DirectX 12, the N4020 is a good choice.
- If you are on a strict budget, both processors offer excellent value for money.
The Verdict: A Balanced Decision
Both the Intel Celeron Quad Core N5100 and N4020 are capable budget-friendly quad-core processors. The N5100 offers slightly better performance, while the N4020 has an edge in integrated graphics. Ultimately, the best choice for you will depend on your specific requirements and preferences.
Basics You Wanted To Know
1. Which processor has a higher clock speed?
Both processors have the same base and turbo boost clock speeds of 1.1 GHz and 2.8 GHz, respectively.
2. Is the N5100 more efficient than the N4020?
No, both processors have the same TDP of 6W and offer comparable power consumption and thermal performance.
3. Can I play games on either of these processors?
Yes, light gaming and indie games are possible on both processors, but the N4020 has slightly better integrated graphics capabilities.
4. Which processor is better for video editing?
The N4020 is slightly better for video editing due to its support for DirectX 12 and OpenGL 4.5, which are more advanced graphics features.
5. Are these processors suitable for laptops?
Yes, both processors are well-suited for laptops and other devices that prioritize battery life and thermal performance.
