What To Know
- However, the AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics in the Ryzen 3 3200U is significantly more powerful than the Intel UHD Graphics 600 in the N4020.
- If you need a device that offers the best performance for demanding tasks, the AMD Ryzen 3 3200U is the better option.
- However, if you need a device with longer battery life and a lower price, the Intel Celeron N4020 is a better choice.
When it comes to budget-friendly laptops and mini PCs, the Intel Celeron N4020 and AMD Ryzen 3 3200U are two of the most popular options. Both processors offer a balance of performance and affordability, but which one is the better choice for your needs? In this comprehensive comparison, we’ll delve into the specifications, performance, battery life, and other key factors to help you make an informed decision between the Intel Celeron N4020 vs Ryzen 3 3200U.
Specifications
| Feature | Intel Celeron N4020 | AMD Ryzen 3 3200U |
| — | — | — |
| Cores | 2 | 2 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Base Clock Speed | 1.1 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Turbo Boost Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Cache | 4MB | 4MB |
| TDP | 6W | 15W |
| Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 600 | AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics |
Performance
In terms of raw performance, the AMD Ryzen 3 3200U has a clear advantage over the Intel Celeron N4020. With its higher clock speeds, additional cores, and threads, the Ryzen 3 3200U offers significantly better performance in both single-core and multi-core tasks. This makes it a better choice for users who need a laptop or mini PC that can handle more demanding tasks, such as video editing, light gaming, or multitasking.
Battery Life
When it comes to battery life, the Intel Celeron N4020 has the upper hand due to its lower power consumption. The 6W TDP of the N4020 allows for longer battery life in laptops and mini PCs. This makes it a better choice for users who need a device that can last for several hours on a single charge.
Graphics Performance
Both the Intel Celeron N4020 and AMD Ryzen 3 3200U come with integrated graphics. However, the AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics in the Ryzen 3 3200U is significantly more powerful than the Intel UHD Graphics 600 in the N4020. This makes the Ryzen 3 3200U a better choice for users who need a device that can handle some light gaming or graphics-intensive tasks.
Other Factors
In addition to performance, battery life, and graphics, there are a few other factors to consider when choosing between the Intel Celeron N4020 and AMD Ryzen 3 3200U. These include:
- Price: The Intel Celeron N4020 is generally cheaper than the AMD Ryzen 3 3200U.
- Availability: The Ryzen 3 3200U is more widely available than the N4020.
- Support: Intel and AMD both provide good support for their processors.
Which One Should You Choose?
The best choice between the Intel Celeron N4020 and AMD Ryzen 3 3200U depends on your specific needs and budget. If you need a device that offers the best performance for demanding tasks, the AMD Ryzen 3 3200U is the better option. However, if you need a device with longer battery life and a lower price, the Intel Celeron N4020 is a better choice.
Verdict
Both the Intel Celeron N4020 and AMD Ryzen 3 3200U are solid budget-friendly processors. The Ryzen 3 3200U offers better performance, while the N4020 offers longer battery life and a lower price. Ultimately, the best choice depends on your specific needs and budget.
Quick Answers to Your FAQs
1. Which processor is better for gaming?
The AMD Ryzen 3 3200U has better graphics performance and is therefore better for gaming.
2. Which processor is better for video editing?
The AMD Ryzen 3 3200U has more cores and threads and is therefore better for video editing.
3. Which processor is better for multitasking?
The AMD Ryzen 3 3200U has more cores and threads and is therefore better for multitasking.
4. Which processor is cheaper?
The Intel Celeron N4020 is generally cheaper than the AMD Ryzen 3 3200U.
5. Which processor is more widely available?
The AMD Ryzen 3 3200U is more widely available than the N4020.
