What To Know
- However, the Celeron N4020 is typically found in slightly more affordable devices, making it a better choice for budget-conscious buyers.
- The choice between the Intel Celeron N4020 and the MediaTek MT8173C depends on the specific requirements and preferences of the user.
- If multi-threaded performance and better graphics capabilities are a priority, the MediaTek MT8173C is the better choice.
When it comes to entry-level laptops and tablets, budget is often a primary consideration. Two popular processors in this market segment are the Intel Celeron N4020 and the MediaTek MT8173C. Both offer a balance of performance and affordability, but which one is the better choice? This blog post will delve into a comprehensive comparison of the Intel Celeron N4020 vs MediaTek MT8173C, examining their key specifications, performance, and overall value.
Key Specifications
| Feature | Intel Celeron N4020 | MediaTek MT8173C |
| — | — | — |
| Cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Base Clock Speed | 1.10 GHz | 1.80 GHz |
| Turbo Boost Speed | 2.80 GHz | 2.20 GHz |
| Cache | 4 MB L2 | 6 MB L3 |
| Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 600 | PowerVR GE8300 |
| Fabrication Process | 14nm | 12nm |
| TDP | 6W | 10W |
Performance Comparison
CPU Performance:
In terms of CPU performance, the MediaTek MT8173C has the edge over the Intel Celeron N4020. With its higher core count and base clock speed, it offers better multi-threaded performance and can handle more demanding tasks, such as multitasking and basic video editing.
Graphics Performance:
When it comes to graphics performance, the Intel Celeron N4020 takes the lead. Its Intel UHD Graphics 600 is more powerful than the PowerVR GE8300 found in the MediaTek MT8173C. This makes the Celeron N4020 a better choice for casual gaming and video playback.
Overall Performance:
For general use, such as web browsing, email, and office applications, both processors offer sufficient performance. However, for more intensive tasks, the MediaTek MT8173C provides a slightly better experience due to its higher core count.
Battery Life
The Intel Celeron N4020 has a lower TDP (6W) compared to the MediaTek MT8173C (10W). This means that devices powered by the Celeron N4020 may have longer battery life, especially for tasks that do not require sustained high performance.
Value for Money
Both the Intel Celeron N4020 and the MediaTek MT8173C offer good value for money. However, the Celeron N4020 is typically found in slightly more affordable devices, making it a better choice for budget-conscious buyers.
Recommendations: Deciding Between the Intel Celeron N4020 and MediaTek MT8173C
The choice between the Intel Celeron N4020 and the MediaTek MT8173C depends on the specific requirements and preferences of the user.
- If multi-threaded performance and better graphics capabilities are a priority, the MediaTek MT8173C is the better choice.
- If battery life and affordability are more important, the Intel Celeron N4020 is the more suitable option.
Ultimately, both processors offer a solid balance of performance and value, making them excellent choices for budget-friendly laptops and tablets.
Basics You Wanted To Know
Q: Which processor is better for gaming?
A: The Intel Celeron N4020 has better graphics performance, making it more suitable for casual gaming.
Q: Which processor is more power efficient?
A: The Intel Celeron N4020 has a lower TDP, resulting in potentially longer battery life.
Q: Which processor is more affordable?
A: The Intel Celeron N4020 is typically found in more affordable devices compared to the MediaTek MT8173C.
Q: Which processor has more cores?
A: The MediaTek MT8173C has 4 cores, while the Intel Celeron N4020 has only 2 cores.
Q: Which processor has a higher base clock speed?
A: The MediaTek MT8173C has a higher base clock speed of 1.80 GHz, compared to the Celeron N4020’s 1.10 GHz.
