What To Know
- The Intel Celeron N3450 is a quad-core processor based on Intel’s Apollo Lake architecture, while the Atom X5 Z8350 is a quad-core processor built on Intel’s Cherry Trail architecture.
- The Intel Celeron N3450 is better suited for devices that require a balance of performance and power efficiency, such as budget laptops, Chromebooks, and mini PCs.
- The Intel Celeron N3450 is a better choice for budget laptops that require a balance of performance and power efficiency.
The budget processor market is a fiercely competitive landscape, with Intel and Atom vying for supremacy with their respective Celeron and Atom X5 series. In this comprehensive comparison, we pit the Intel Celeron N3450 against the Atom X5 Z8350, two popular budget processors, to determine which one reigns supreme.
Architecture and Specifications
The Intel Celeron N3450 is a quad-core processor based on Intel’s Apollo Lake architecture, while the Atom X5 Z8350 is a quad-core processor built on Intel’s Cherry Trail architecture. Both processors feature a 64-bit architecture and support up to 8GB of RAM.
| Feature | Intel Celeron N3450 | Atom X5 Z8350 |
| — | — | — |
| Architecture | Apollo Lake | Cherry Trail |
| Cores | 4 | 4 |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base Clock Speed | 1.1GHz | 1.44GHz |
| Turbo Boost Speed | 2.2GHz | 1.92GHz |
| Cache | 2MB L2 | 2MB L2 |
| TDP | 6W | 2W |
Performance Comparison
In terms of performance, the Intel Celeron N3450 generally outperforms the Atom X5 Z8350. The N3450’s higher base and turbo boost speeds, coupled with its more advanced architecture, provide it with a significant edge in both single-core and multi-core tasks.
Graphics Performance
Both processors feature integrated graphics, but the Intel Celeron N3450’s Intel HD Graphics 500 is superior to the Atom X5 Z8350’s Intel HD Graphics 400. This difference is particularly noticeable in gaming and graphics-intensive applications.
Power Consumption
The Atom X5 Z8350 has a lower TDP (thermal design power) of 2W compared to the N3450’s 6W. This makes the Z8350 more energy-efficient, which is a significant advantage for devices that rely on battery power.
Price and Availability
The Intel Celeron N3450 is typically more expensive than the Atom X5 Z8350. However, the price difference is often minimal, and the N3450’s superior performance makes it a more compelling choice for most users.
Applications and Use Cases
The Intel Celeron N3450 is better suited for devices that require a balance of performance and power efficiency, such as budget laptops, Chromebooks, and mini PCs. The Atom X5 Z8350 is ideal for ultra-portable devices and tablets that prioritize battery life over performance.
Final Note: The Verdict
The Intel Celeron N3450 emerges as the clear winner in this comparison. Its superior performance, better graphics capabilities, and slightly higher price point make it the ideal choice for users who prioritize performance and versatility. The Atom X5 Z8350 remains a solid budget option for devices that prioritize energy efficiency and portability.
Answers to Your Questions
Q1: Which processor is better for gaming?
A: The Intel Celeron N3450 has superior graphics performance, making it a better choice for gaming.
Q2: Which processor is more energy-efficient?
A: The Atom X5 Z8350 has a lower TDP, making it more energy-efficient.
Q3: Which processor is better for a budget laptop?
A: The Intel Celeron N3450 is a better choice for budget laptops that require a balance of performance and power efficiency.
Q4: Which processor is better for a tablet?
A: The Atom X5 Z8350 is a better choice for tablets that prioritize battery life over performance.
Q5: Which processor is more future-proof?
A: The Intel Celeron N3450 is based on a newer architecture and has better performance, making it more future-proof.
