Intel Celeron N3350 Vs Atom Z8350

In the realm of affordable computing, the Intel Celeron N3350 and Atom Z8350 processors stand as popular choices for budget-conscious users. Both offer a balance of performance and affordability, but understanding their key differences is crucial before making a decision. This comprehensive comparison delves into the specifications, performance benchmarks, and key features of the Intel Celeron N3350 vs. Atom Z8350 to guide you towards an informed choice.

Specifications and Architecture

The Intel Celeron N3350 is a quad-core processor based on the Apollo Lake architecture, while the Atom Z8350 is a quad-core processor based on the Cherry Trail architecture. The Celeron N3350 has a higher base clock speed of 1.1 GHz compared to the Atom Z8350’s 1.44 GHz, but the Atom Z8350 can turbo boost up to 1.92 GHz, while the Celeron N3350 can only turbo boost up to 2.4 GHz. Both processors have a 2 MB cache and support up to 8 GB of DDR3L memory.

Performance Benchmarks

In terms of performance, the Celeron N3350 generally outperforms the Atom Z8350 in most benchmarks. In the Geekbench 4 single-core test, the Celeron N3350 scores around 1,500 points, while the Atom Z8350 scores around 1,200 points. In the Geekbench 4 multi-core test, the Celeron N3350 scores around 3,500 points, while the Atom Z8350 scores around 2,700 points.

Graphics Performance

Both the Celeron N3350 and Atom Z8350 have integrated graphics, but the Celeron N3350’s Intel HD Graphics 500 is generally more powerful than the Atom Z8350’s Intel HD Graphics 400. The Celeron N3350 is capable of handling basic gaming and video playback, while the Atom Z8350 is more suited for casual gaming and video playback.

Power Consumption and Battery Life

The Atom Z8350 has a lower TDP (thermal design power) of 2 watts compared to the Celeron N3350’s 6 watts. This means that the Atom Z8350 is more power-efficient and can provide longer battery life in laptops and tablets.

Features and Connectivity

Both the Celeron N3350 and Atom Z8350 support a variety of features and connectivity options. They both have built-in Wi-Fi and Bluetooth connectivity, and they both support USB 3.0 and USB 2.0 ports. The Celeron N3350 also supports SATA 3.0, while the Atom Z8350 does not.

Which Processor is Right for You?

The choice between the Intel Celeron N3350 and Atom Z8350 depends on your specific needs and preferences. If you need a more powerful processor for basic gaming, video editing, or multitasking, the Celeron N3350 is a better choice. However, if you need a more power-efficient processor for a laptop or tablet with long battery life, the Atom Z8350 is a better choice.

The Bottom Line: Finding the Perfect Balance

The Intel Celeron N3350 and Atom Z8350 are both excellent budget-friendly processors that offer a good balance of performance and affordability. The Celeron N3350 provides better performance, while the Atom Z8350 provides better power efficiency and battery life. Ultimately, the best processor for you depends on your individual needs and preferences.

Information You Need to Know

Q: Which processor is better for gaming?
A: The Intel Celeron N3350 is a better choice for gaming due to its higher performance.

Q: Which processor has better battery life?
A: The Atom Z8350 has better battery life due to its lower power consumption.

Q: Which processor is more affordable?
A: Both processors are similarly priced, with the Celeron N3350 being slightly more expensive in some cases.

Q: Which processor is better for video editing?
A: The Celeron N3350 is a better choice for video editing due to its higher performance.

Q: Which processor is better for multitasking?
A: The Celeron N3350 is a better choice for multitasking due to its higher performance.