What To Know
- On the other hand, the Intel Atom X5-Z8350 is a quad-core processor with a lower base clock speed of 1.
- The Intel Atom X5-Z8350, on the other hand, is a system-on-a-chip (SoC) that integrates both the processor and graphics into a single package.
- However, if you are on a tight budget and primarily use your device for basic tasks, the Intel Celeron N2840 offers a cost-effective option.
In the realm of budget-friendly processors, Intel’s Celeron N2840 and Atom X5-Z8350 stand out as two popular options. Both processors offer affordable computing solutions for everyday tasks, but their respective strengths and weaknesses differ. This comprehensive comparison will delve into the key differences between the Intel Celeron N2840 and Intel Atom X5-Z8350, helping you make an informed decision when choosing a budget-conscious processor.
Architecture and Specifications
The Intel Celeron N2840 is a dual-core processor with a base clock speed of 2.16 GHz and a maximum turbo frequency of 2.58 GHz. It features a 64-bit architecture and comes with 2 MB of L2 cache. On the other hand, the Intel Atom X5-Z8350 is a quad-core processor with a lower base clock speed of 1.44 GHz and a maximum turbo frequency of 1.92 GHz. It also has a 64-bit architecture and offers 2 MB of L2 cache.
Performance Comparison
In terms of performance, the quad-core Intel Atom X5-Z8350 generally has an edge over the dual-core Intel Celeron N2840. The additional cores provide improved multi-tasking capabilities, allowing the X5-Z8350 to handle multiple applications simultaneously with greater ease. However, the Celeron N2840’s higher clock speeds may provide an advantage in single-threaded tasks.
Power Consumption and Battery Life
The Intel Atom X5-Z8350 is designed to be more power-efficient than the Intel Celeron N2840. It features a lower thermal design power (TDP) of 2 watts compared to the Celeron N2840’s 7.5 watts. This lower power consumption translates to longer battery life in laptops and other portable devices.
Graphics Capabilities
Both the Intel Celeron N2840 and Intel Atom X5-Z8350 integrate Intel HD Graphics for basic graphics processing. However, the Celeron N2840’s HD Graphics (Bay Trail) has 4 execution units (EUs), while the Atom X5-Z8350’s HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) has 12 EUs. This difference gives the X5-Z8350 a slight advantage in terms of graphics performance.
Compatibility and Use Cases
The Intel Celeron N2840 is a socket-based processor designed for use in desktop and laptop computers. It is typically found in entry-level laptops and desktops intended for basic tasks such as web browsing, email, and office productivity. The Intel Atom X5-Z8350, on the other hand, is a system-on-a-chip (SoC) that integrates both the processor and graphics into a single package. It is commonly used in tablets, convertibles, and other mobile devices.
Price and Value
The Intel Celeron N2840 and Intel Atom X5-Z8350 are both budget-friendly processors. The Celeron N2840 is generally more affordable than the Atom X5-Z8350, but the latter offers better performance and power efficiency. Ultimately, the best value depends on your specific needs and budget.
Conclusion: Choosing the Right Processor
The choice between the Intel Celeron N2840 and Intel Atom X5-Z8350 ultimately depends on your individual requirements and preferences. If you prioritize performance and battery life, the Intel Atom X5-Z8350 is a better choice. However, if you are on a tight budget and primarily use your device for basic tasks, the Intel Celeron N2840 offers a cost-effective option.
What You Need to Know
Q1: Which processor is better for gaming?
A: Neither the Intel Celeron N2840 nor the Intel Atom X5-Z8350 is suitable for demanding gaming. They are designed for basic tasks and light gaming at best.
Q2: Can I upgrade my laptop with either of these processors?
A: The Intel Celeron N2840 is a socket-based processor, so it can theoretically be upgraded. However, upgrading a laptop processor is a complex and often expensive process. The Intel Atom X5-Z8350 is not upgradeable as it is integrated into the motherboard.
Q3: Which processor is more energy-efficient?
A: The Intel Atom X5-Z8350 is more energy-efficient than the Intel Celeron N2840 due to its lower TDP. This translates to longer battery life in portable devices.
Q4: Are these processors suitable for video editing?
A: No, neither the Intel Celeron N2840 nor the Intel Atom X5-Z8350 is powerful enough for video editing. They are not designed to handle demanding tasks that require heavy processing power.
Q5: Can I use these processors for programming?
A: Yes, you can use either processor for basic programming tasks. However, for more complex programming projects, you may need a more powerful processor.
