Intel Celeron J4125 Vs Ryzen 3 3250u
What To Know
- The Intel Celeron J4125 is a quad-core processor based on the Gemini Lake architecture, while the AMD Ryzen 3 3250U is a quad-core processor based on the Zen+ architecture.
- The AMD Radeon Vega 3 graphics in the Ryzen 3 3250U offers superior graphics performance compared to the Intel UHD Graphics 600 in the Celeron J4125.
- The Intel Celeron J4125 has a TDP of 10W, while the AMD Ryzen 3 3250U has a TDP of 15W.
In the realm of budget processors, the Intel Celeron J4125 and AMD Ryzen 3 3250U stand out as contenders for affordable computing. These processors offer a balance of performance and value, catering to users with modest computing needs. In this blog post, we will delve into a comprehensive comparison of the Intel Celeron J4125 vs Ryzen 3 3250U, exploring their key features, performance benchmarks, and suitability for various tasks.
Architecture and Specifications
The Intel Celeron J4125 is a quad-core processor based on the Gemini Lake architecture, while the AMD Ryzen 3 3250U is a quad-core processor based on the Zen+ architecture. Both processors feature a 14nm fabrication process and support dual-channel DDR4 memory.
Feature | Intel Celeron J4125 | AMD Ryzen 3 3250U |
— | — | — |
Cores | 4 | 4 |
Threads | 4 | 4 |
Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
Boost Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
TDP | 10W | 15W |
Performance Benchmarks
To assess the performance of these processors, we will examine various benchmarks:
Cinebench R23
- Intel Celeron J4125: 1,300 points
- AMD Ryzen 3 3250U: 2,300 points
Geekbench 5
- Intel Celeron J4125: Single-Core: 750 points, Multi-Core: 2,200 points
- AMD Ryzen 3 3250U: Single-Core: 1,000 points, Multi-Core: 3,000 points
PCMark 10
- Intel Celeron J4125: 2,500 points
- AMD Ryzen 3 3250U: 3,500 points
As evident from the benchmarks, the AMD Ryzen 3 3250U outperforms the Intel Celeron J4125 in both single-core and multi-core performance. This is attributed to its higher base and boost clock speeds, as well as its Zen+ architecture.
Graphics Performance
Both the Intel Celeron J4125 and AMD Ryzen 3 3250U feature integrated graphics.
- Intel Celeron J4125: Intel UHD Graphics 600
- AMD Ryzen 3 3250U: AMD Radeon Vega 3
3DMark Time Spy
- Intel Celeron J4125: 350 points
- AMD Ryzen 3 3250U: 600 points
The AMD Radeon Vega 3 graphics in the Ryzen 3 3250U offers superior graphics performance compared to the Intel UHD Graphics 600 in the Celeron J4125.
Power Consumption and Efficiency
The Intel Celeron J4125 has a TDP of 10W, while the AMD Ryzen 3 3250U has a TDP of 15W. This means that the Celeron J4125 is more power-efficient and suitable for devices with limited thermal constraints.
Suitability for Different Tasks
Basic Computing
Both processors are suitable for basic computing tasks such as web browsing, email, and office productivity.
Multimedia
The Ryzen 3 3250U’s superior graphics performance makes it a better choice for multimedia tasks such as video playback and light gaming.
Gaming
Neither processor is ideal for gaming, but the Ryzen 3 3250U can handle less demanding games at low settings.
Pricing and Availability
The Intel Celeron J4125 is typically priced around $50, while the AMD Ryzen 3 3250U is typically priced around $80. Both processors are widely available in laptops and mini PCs.
Final Thoughts: Intel Celeron J4125 vs Ryzen 3 3250U
The Intel Celeron J4125 and AMD Ryzen 3 3250U are both capable budget processors, but each has its own strengths and weaknesses. The Celeron J4125 is more power-efficient and suitable for basic computing, while the Ryzen 3 3250U offers better performance for multimedia and gaming. Ultimately, the best choice for you will depend on your specific needs and budget.
What You Need to Learn
Q: Which processor is better for gaming?
A: The AMD Ryzen 3 3250U offers better gaming performance than the Intel Celeron J4125.
Q: Which processor is more power-efficient?
A: The Intel Celeron J4125 is more power-efficient than the AMD Ryzen 3 3250U.
Q: Which processor is more affordable?
A: The Intel Celeron J4125 is typically more affordable than the AMD Ryzen 3 3250U.