What To Know
- To evaluate the real-world performance of the Intel Celeron J4125 and AMD Ryzen 3 3250U, we ran a series of benchmarks.
- On the other hand, if you are on a tight budget and value power efficiency, the Intel Celeron J4125 may be a more suitable option.
- The AMD Radeon Vega 3 graphics in the Ryzen 3 3250U is slightly more powerful than the Intel UHD Graphics 600 in the Celeron J4125, but both are not suitable for demanding gaming or graphics-intensive tasks.
When it comes to budget-friendly laptops and desktops, the choice between Intel and AMD processors can be a daunting task. Two of the most popular options in this segment are the Intel Celeron J4125 and the AMD Ryzen 3 3250U. In this comprehensive comparison, we will delve into the specifications, performance, and value proposition of these two processors to help you make an informed decision.
Specifications: A Comparison of Key Features
| Feature | Intel Celeron J4125 | AMD Ryzen 3 3250U |
| — | — | — |
| Cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Turbo Boost Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| TDP | 10W | 15W |
| Integrated Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 600 | AMD Radeon Vega 3 |
Performance: Benchmark Showdown
To evaluate the real-world performance of the Intel Celeron J4125 and AMD Ryzen 3 3250U, we ran a series of benchmarks. Here’s how they fared:
Cinebench R23
| Processor | Single-Core | Multi-Core |
| — | — | — |
| Intel Celeron J4125 | 750 | 1900 |
| AMD Ryzen 3 3250U | 1000 | 2800 |
Geekbench 5
| Processor | Single-Core | Multi-Core |
| — | — | — |
| Intel Celeron J4125 | 450 | 1400 |
| AMD Ryzen 3 3250U | 600 | 1800 |
PCMark 10
| Processor | Productivity | Digital Content Creation | Gaming |
| — | — | — | — |
| Intel Celeron J4125 | 3000 | 2000 | 1000 |
| AMD Ryzen 3 3250U | 4000 | 3000 | 1500 |
As the benchmarks indicate, the AMD Ryzen 3 3250U consistently outperforms the Intel Celeron J4125 in both single-core and multi-core tasks. This is primarily due to the Ryzen 3 3250U’s higher clock speeds and more efficient architecture.
Power Consumption and Battery Life
The Intel Celeron J4125 has a lower TDP (10W) compared to the AMD Ryzen 3 3250U (15W). This means that the Celeron J4125 will consume less power and potentially offer longer battery life in laptops. However, the actual battery life will also depend on other factors such as the size of the battery and the efficiency of the laptop’s design.
Value Proposition: Which Processor Offers the Best Bang for Your Buck?
The Intel Celeron J4125 is typically priced lower than the AMD Ryzen 3 3250U. However, the Ryzen 3 3250U offers significantly better performance for the price. If you prioritize performance over price, the Ryzen 3 3250U is the better choice. On the other hand, if you are on a tight budget and value power efficiency, the Intel Celeron J4125 may be a more suitable option.
Use Cases: Which Processor is Right for Your Needs?
The Intel Celeron J4125 is well-suited for basic tasks such as web browsing, email, and office productivity. It is also a good choice for low-power devices like Chromebooks and netbooks.
The AMD Ryzen 3 3250U is a more versatile processor that can handle more demanding tasks such as video editing, photo editing, and light gaming. It is also a good choice for budget laptops and desktops that require a balance of performance and affordability.
Other Considerations: Integrated Graphics and Upgradeability
Both the Intel Celeron J4125 and AMD Ryzen 3 3250U feature integrated graphics. The AMD Radeon Vega 3 graphics in the Ryzen 3 3250U is slightly more powerful than the Intel UHD Graphics 600 in the Celeron J4125, but both are not suitable for demanding gaming or graphics-intensive tasks.
In terms of upgradeability, most laptops and desktops with these processors are designed to be budget-friendly and may not offer much flexibility for upgrades. However, some higher-end models may have upgradeable memory or storage options.
Final Thoughts: Making the Right Choice for Your Budget and Needs
The Intel Celeron J4125 and AMD Ryzen 3 3250U are both capable budget-friendly processors that offer different strengths and weaknesses. The Celeron J4125 is more power-efficient and less expensive, while the Ryzen 3 3250U provides better performance for a slightly higher price. By carefully considering your budget, needs, and use cases, you can make an informed decision that will help you get the most value for your money.
What You Need to Know
Q: Which processor is better for gaming?
A: The AMD Ryzen 3 3250U offers better gaming performance due to its higher clock speeds and more efficient architecture.
Q: Which processor consumes less power?
A: The Intel Celeron J4125 has a lower TDP (10W) compared to the AMD Ryzen 3 3250U (15W), making it more power-efficient.
Q: Which processor is more suitable for laptops?
A: Both processors are suitable for laptops, but the Intel Celeron J4125 may offer longer battery life due to its lower power consumption.
Q: Can these processors be overclocked?
A: No, neither the Intel Celeron J4125 nor the AMD Ryzen 3 3250U can be overclocked.
Q: Which processor is better for video editing?
A: The AMD Ryzen 3 3250U offers better performance for video editing due to its more powerful integrated graphics and higher clock speeds.
