Intel Celeron B815 Vs Core I3: The Budget Battle Royale
What To Know
- The Intel Core i3 series represents a step up from the Celeron processors, offering a better balance of performance and affordability.
- The Core i3-1115G4 has a larger cache size (6MB) compared to the Celeron B815 (4MB), which improves its ability to store frequently accessed data and reduce memory latency.
- The Core i3-1115G4 has a higher IPC than the Celeron B815, meaning it can execute more instructions per clock cycle, resulting in better performance.
The Intel Celeron B815 is an entry-level processor designed for budget-conscious users. It features two cores and two threads, operating at a base clock speed of 1.6 GHz and a turbo boost speed of 2.4 GHz. With a TDP of 15W, it is suitable for compact and energy-efficient systems.
Intel Core i3: A Balanced Performer
The Intel Core i3 series represents a step up from the Celeron processors, offering a better balance of performance and affordability. The Core i3-1115G4, a popular choice in this range, boasts four cores and eight threads. It runs at a base clock speed of 3.0 GHz and can reach a turbo boost speed of 4.1 GHz. With a TDP of 15W, it is also power-efficient.
Performance Comparison
Single-Core Performance: The Core i3-1115G4 outperforms the Celeron B815 in single-core tasks due to its higher clock speed and improved architecture. This advantage is evident in applications that rely heavily on single-threaded performance, such as web browsing and office productivity.
Multi-Core Performance: With four cores and eight threads, the Core i3-1115G4 has a significant advantage in multi-threaded workloads. This is crucial for tasks that can leverage multiple threads, such as video editing, image processing, and multitasking.
Graphics Performance: The Core i3-1115G4 integrates Intel UHD Graphics, which provides better graphics capabilities than the Celeron B815’s integrated graphics. This makes the Core i3 a more suitable choice for light gaming and multimedia consumption.
Other Key Differences
Cache Size: The Core i3-1115G4 has a larger cache size (6MB) compared to the Celeron B815 (4MB), which improves its ability to store frequently accessed data and reduce memory latency.
Instructions Per Cycle (IPC): The Core i3-1115G4 has a higher IPC than the Celeron B815, meaning it can execute more instructions per clock cycle, resulting in better performance.
Overclocking: The Core i3-1115G4 supports overclocking, allowing users to push its performance beyond its factory specifications. However, the Celeron B815 does not support overclocking.
Which Processor is Right for You?
The choice between the Intel Celeron B815 and the Core i3 depends on your specific needs and budget.
Celeron B815:
- Ideal for basic computing tasks, web browsing, and office productivity
- Budget-friendly option for entry-level systems
- Energy-efficient with a low TDP
Core i3:
- Better performance for multitasking, video editing, and light gaming
- Four cores and eight threads provide a significant advantage in multi-threaded workloads
- Supports overclocking for performance enthusiasts
When to Choose the Celeron B815
- You prioritize affordability over performance
- You primarily use your computer for basic tasks
- You want a low-power and energy-efficient system
When to Choose the Core i3
- You need better performance for demanding tasks
- You multitask frequently or run resource-intensive applications
- You want a processor with more cores and threads
- You consider overclocking for additional performance
Popular Questions
Q: Which processor has the higher clock speed?
A: The Core i3-1115G4 has a higher clock speed (3.0 GHz base, 4.1 GHz turbo) than the Celeron B815 (1.6 GHz base, 2.4 GHz turbo).
Q: How many cores and threads do each processor have?
A: The Core i3-1115G4 has four cores and eight threads, while the Celeron B815 has two cores and two threads.
Q: Which processor has better graphics capabilities?
A: The Core i3-1115G4 has better graphics capabilities with its integrated Intel UHD Graphics compared to the Celeron B815’s integrated graphics.