What To Know
- The Intel Atom Z3735F is a quad-core processor based on the Silvermont microarchitecture, while the Celeron N4000 is a dual-core processor built on the Gemini Lake Refresh microarchitecture.
- In terms of cache, the Z3735F has a 2 MB L2 cache, while the N4000 has a 4 MB L2 cache, offering faster access to frequently used data.
- The Celeron N4000 is a more versatile processor that can handle a wider range of applications, including casual gaming, video playback, and light photo editing.
In the realm of budget-friendly processors, Intel Atom Z3735F and Celeron N4000 stand out as popular options. However, choosing the right one for your needs can be a daunting task. This comprehensive guide will delve into the intricacies of these processors, comparing their key features, performance, and suitability for various applications. By the end, you’ll be equipped to make an informed decision.
Architectural Differences
The Intel Atom Z3735F is a quad-core processor based on the Silvermont microarchitecture, while the Celeron N4000 is a dual-core processor built on the Gemini Lake Refresh microarchitecture. The N4000’s newer microarchitecture brings significant improvements in efficiency and power management.
Clock Speed and Cache
The Z3735F operates at a base clock speed of 1.33 GHz, while the N4000 clocks in at 1.1 GHz. However, the N4000 has a higher turbo boost speed of 2.6 GHz compared to the Z3735F’s 1.83 GHz. In terms of cache, the Z3735F has a 2 MB L2 cache, while the N4000 has a 4 MB L2 cache, offering faster access to frequently used data.
Performance Comparison
In real-world benchmarks, the Celeron N4000 consistently outperforms the Atom Z3735F. It offers better single-core performance, making it more responsive for tasks like web browsing, email, and office productivity. The N4000 also has a slight edge in multi-core performance, handling tasks like video playback and image editing more smoothly.
Graphics Capabilities
Both processors feature integrated graphics, but the N4000 has a more powerful Intel UHD Graphics 600 GPU compared to the Z3735F’s Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail). This gives the N4000 a significant advantage for casual gaming and light video editing.
Power Consumption and Battery Life
The Intel Atom Z3735F is renowned for its low power consumption, making it ideal for devices with limited battery life. The Celeron N4000 is also power-efficient, but its higher performance comes at a slight cost in terms of battery life.
Suitability for Different Applications
The Intel Atom Z3735F is best suited for basic computing tasks, such as web browsing, email, and word processing. It’s also a good choice for devices with tight power constraints. The Celeron N4000 is a more versatile processor that can handle a wider range of applications, including casual gaming, video playback, and light photo editing.
Recommendations: Making the Right Choice
Choosing between the Intel Atom Z3735F and Celeron N4000 depends on your specific needs and budget. If you prioritize battery life and basic computing tasks, the Z3735F is an excellent option. For better performance, versatility, and graphics capabilities, the N4000 is the way to go.
Frequently Discussed Topics
Q: Which processor is better for web browsing and email?
A: Both processors are capable of handling these tasks, but the Celeron N4000 offers slightly better performance.
Q: Can I play games on these processors?
A: Yes, but only casual games. The Celeron N4000 has a more powerful GPU, making it better for gaming.
Q: Which processor is more power-efficient?
A: The Intel Atom Z3735F consumes less power than the Celeron N4000.
Q: Which processor is better for laptops?
A: The Celeron N4000 is generally better for laptops due to its higher performance and better battery life.
Q: Which processor is better for tablets?
A: The Intel Atom Z3735F is more suitable for tablets due to its low power consumption and compact size.
