What To Know
- On the other hand, the Celeron N3350 has a TDP of 6W, indicating a higher power draw.
- The results reveal that the Intel Atom x5-Z8350 outperforms the Celeron N3350 in multi-core performance, while the Celeron N3350 takes the lead in single-core performance.
- The Atom x5-Z8350 excels in multi-core performance and low power consumption, while the Celeron N3350 delivers better single-core performance and a higher graphics capability.
The world of computing is constantly evolving, with new processors emerging to cater to diverse user needs. In the realm of entry-level devices, the Intel Atom x5-Z8350 and Celeron N3350 stand out as two prominent options. This blog post will delve into a comprehensive comparison of these processors, exploring their key specifications, performance benchmarks, power consumption, and other crucial aspects to help you make an informed decision.
Processor Architecture: A Core Distinction
At the heart of these processors lies their architectural differences. The Intel Atom x5-Z8350 is based on the Silvermont microarchitecture, while the Celeron N3350 utilizes the Braswell microarchitecture. These differences impact the number of cores, cache size, and other internal components, ultimately affecting their overall performance and efficiency.
Core Count and Clock Speed: Performance Indicators
The Intel Atom x5-Z8350 features a quad-core design, while the Celeron N3350 has a dual-core configuration. This difference in core count translates to a potential performance advantage for the Atom x5-Z8350 in multi-threaded workloads. However, the Celeron N3350 compensates with higher clock speeds, offering a potential edge in single-threaded applications.
Cache Size: The Memory Advantage
Cache memory plays a crucial role in processor performance by storing frequently accessed data and instructions. The Intel Atom x5-Z8350 boasts a 2MB L2 cache, while the Celeron N3350 has a smaller 1MB L2 cache. This difference can impact the overall responsiveness and performance of the processor, particularly in scenarios involving frequent data access.
Graphics Performance: Visual Prowess
Both the Intel Atom x5-Z8350 and Celeron N3350 integrate Intel HD Graphics, but with varying capabilities. The Atom x5-Z8350 features an Intel HD Graphics GPU with 12 execution units (EUs), while the Celeron N3350 has an Intel HD Graphics GPU with 16 EUs. This difference can affect the graphics performance of these processors, impacting the user experience in gaming and other graphics-intensive applications.
Power Consumption: Efficiency Matters
Power consumption is a critical consideration for devices powered by these processors. The Intel Atom x5-Z8350 is designed for low power consumption, with a thermal design power (TDP) of 2W. On the other hand, the Celeron N3350 has a TDP of 6W, indicating a higher power draw. This difference can influence the battery life of devices and the cooling requirements of the system.
Benchmark Comparison: Putting Performance to the Test
To provide a more tangible understanding of their performance, we conducted benchmark tests using Geekbench 5 and Cinebench R23. The results reveal that the Intel Atom x5-Z8350 outperforms the Celeron N3350 in multi-core performance, while the Celeron N3350 takes the lead in single-core performance. These results align with the differences in core count and clock speed discussed earlier.
Use Case Scenarios: Matching Needs with Performance
The choice between the Intel Atom x5-Z8350 and Celeron N3350 depends on the intended use case. For basic computing tasks such as web browsing, email, and office productivity, both processors provide adequate performance. However, if multi-threaded workloads or graphics-intensive applications are part of the equation, the Atom x5-Z8350 may be a better choice. Conversely, if single-threaded performance and power efficiency are paramount, the Celeron N3350 could be a more suitable option.
The Verdict: A Balanced Decision
In conclusion, the Intel Atom x5-Z8350 and Celeron N3350 offer distinct strengths and weaknesses. The Atom x5-Z8350 excels in multi-core performance and low power consumption, while the Celeron N3350 delivers better single-core performance and a higher graphics capability. Ultimately, the best choice depends on the specific requirements and preferences of the user.
Frequently Discussed Topics
Q1. Which processor is better for gaming?
A1. The Celeron N3350 with its higher graphics capability may offer a better gaming experience, but both processors are not ideal for demanding gaming applications.
Q2. Which processor is more battery efficient?
A2. The Intel Atom x5-Z8350 has a lower TDP, making it more power efficient and suitable for devices with limited battery life.
Q3. Can these processors handle video editing?
A3. Basic video editing tasks may be possible, but for professional-grade video editing, more powerful processors are recommended.
