What To Know
- The Apollo Lake N3350 has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 6 watts, while the Celeron N4020 has a TDP of 6 watts.
- The Celeron N4020 offers better graphics performance than the Apollo Lake N3350, making it a more suitable choice for light gaming.
- The Celeron N4020 offers a more balanced performance and features, making it a better choice for everyday tasks such as web browsing, office work, and media consumption.
When it comes to budget-friendly laptops and other devices, the Intel Apollo Lake N3350 and Intel Celeron N4020 processors often take center stage. Both offer a balance of performance and affordability, but which one is the better choice for your specific needs? This comprehensive comparison will delve into the key differences between these two processors, helping you make an informed decision.
Performance Comparison
Single-Core Performance
The Apollo Lake N3350 features a single-core clock speed of up to 1.1 GHz, while the Celeron N4020 boasts a slightly higher speed of 1.1 GHz. In single-core applications, such as web browsing and office tasks, the N4020 offers a marginal performance advantage.
Multi-Core Performance
Both processors have four cores, but the Celeron N4020 has a higher base clock speed of 1.1 GHz compared to the N3350’s 1.1 GHz. This difference translates to better multi-core performance for the N4020, making it more suitable for multitasking and demanding applications.
Graphics Performance
The Apollo Lake N3350 integrates an Intel HD Graphics 500 GPU, while the Celeron N4020 features an Intel UHD Graphics 600 GPU. The UHD Graphics 600 offers improved graphics performance over the HD Graphics 500, enabling better gaming and video playback capabilities.
Power Consumption
The Apollo Lake N3350 has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 6 watts, while the Celeron N4020 has a TDP of 6 watts. Both processors are designed for low power consumption, making them suitable for laptops and other devices with limited battery life.
Features and Compatibility
Features
The Celeron N4020 supports up to 8GB of DDR4 memory, while the Apollo Lake N3350 supports up to 4GB of DDR3 memory. Additionally, the N4020 supports NVMe storage, while the N3350 does not.
Compatibility
Both processors use the same socket type (BGA1090), making them compatible with a wide range of motherboards and devices. However, it’s important to verify compatibility before purchasing.
Which Processor is Right for You?
The choice between the Apollo Lake N3350 and Celeron N4020 depends on your specific requirements. If you prioritize single-core performance and affordability, the N3350 is a solid option. However, if you need better multi-core performance, graphics capabilities, and more features, the Celeron N4020 is the superior choice.
Recommendations: Finding the Perfect Balance
Both the Apollo Lake N3350 and Celeron N4020 offer excellent value for budget-conscious buyers. By carefully considering the performance, features, and compatibility factors discussed in this comparison, you can make an informed decision and choose the processor that best meets your needs.
Information You Need to Know
1. Which processor is faster for gaming?
The Celeron N4020 offers better graphics performance than the Apollo Lake N3350, making it a more suitable choice for light gaming.
2. Can I overclock either processor?
Overclocking is not supported on either the Apollo Lake N3350 or Celeron N4020.
3. Which processor has better battery life?
Both processors have similar power consumption, so battery life will depend on other factors such as the device’s battery capacity and usage patterns.
4. Can I use either processor for video editing?
While both processors can handle basic video editing tasks, more demanding projects may require a more powerful CPU.
5. Which processor is better for everyday use?
The Celeron N4020 offers a more balanced performance and features, making it a better choice for everyday tasks such as web browsing, office work, and media consumption.
