What To Know
- The Ducky One 3 SF, on the other hand, has a slightly larger 75% layout, featuring dedicated arrow keys and a function row.
- The Ducky One 2 SF also supports Kailh Box switches, while the Ducky One 3 SF is compatible with both Kailh and Gateron switches.
- Both keyboards offer excellent value for the price, but the Ducky One 3 SF provides more customization options and features for a slightly higher cost.
In the realm of mechanical keyboards, Ducky is a name that resonates with enthusiasts. The Ducky One 2 SF and Ducky One 3 SF are two of their most popular offerings, both boasting exceptional build quality, stunning design, and unparalleled performance. But which one is the right choice for you? In this comprehensive guide, we’ll compare the Ducky One 2 SF vs 3 SF in every aspect, helping you make an informed decision.
Build Quality and Design
Both keyboards feature a solid aluminum construction, ensuring durability and longevity. The Ducky One 2 SF has a more traditional design, with a compact 65% layout. The Ducky One 3 SF, on the other hand, has a slightly larger 75% layout, featuring dedicated arrow keys and a function row.
Keycaps and Switches
The Ducky One 2 SF comes with PBT double-shot keycaps, known for their durability and resistance to wear. The Ducky One 3 SF offers both PBT double-shot and PBT dye-sublimated keycaps, providing more options for customization.
As for switches, both keyboards offer a wide range of Cherry MX options, including Red, Blue, Brown, and Silent Red. The Ducky One 2 SF also supports Kailh Box switches, while the Ducky One 3 SF is compatible with both Kailh and Gateron switches.
Features and Functionality
The Ducky One 2 SF features RGB backlighting, allowing you to customize the lighting effects to your liking. The Ducky One 3 SF takes it a step further with per-key RGB backlighting, providing even more granular control over the lighting.
Both keyboards include dedicated multimedia keys and a volume knob, making it easy to control your audio without having to switch windows. The Ducky One 3 SF also features a built-in USB passthrough port for connecting additional peripherals.
Software and Customization
The Ducky One 2 SF uses the Ducky Macro 2.0 software, which allows you to remap keys, create macros, and adjust lighting settings. The Ducky One 3 SF uses the more advanced Ducky Macro 3.0 software, which offers even more customization options, including the ability to create profiles and record custom lighting effects.
Price and Value
The Ducky One 2 SF typically starts at around $120, while the Ducky One 3 SF starts at around $150. Both keyboards offer excellent value for the price, but the Ducky One 3 SF provides more customization options and features for a slightly higher cost.
Which Keyboard Is Right for You?
The best choice between the Ducky One 2 SF and 3 SF depends on your individual needs and preferences. If you prefer a compact layout, the Ducky One 2 SF is a great option. If you want more customization options and features, the Ducky One 3 SF is the better choice.
Beyond the Comparison
Ducky One 2 SF
- Pros: Compact 65% layout, PBT double-shot keycaps, RGB backlighting, Kailh Box switch support
- Cons: Limited customization options, no dedicated arrow keys
Ducky One 3 SF
- Pros: 75% layout with dedicated arrow keys, PBT double-shot and dye-sublimated keycaps, per-key RGB backlighting, Kailh and Gateron switch support, USB passthrough port
- Cons: Slightly more expensive, larger footprint
Answers to Your Questions
Q: Which keyboard has better keycaps?
A: Both keyboards offer high-quality PBT keycaps, but the Ducky One 3 SF provides the option for PBT dye-sublimated keycaps, which are more resistant to fading and wear.
Q: Which keyboard has more customization options?
A: The Ducky One 3 SF has more customization options, including per-key RGB backlighting, more switch options, and advanced macro software.
Q: Which keyboard is better for gaming?
A: Both keyboards are suitable for gaming, but the Ducky One 2 SF’s compact layout may be preferred by some gamers who prefer a smaller footprint.
