What To Know
- The Crucial MX500 and Samsung 870 QVO offer comparable sequential read and write speeds, with both delivering excellent performance for tasks such as loading games, opening large files, and transferring data.
- The Samsung 870 QVO slightly edges out the Crucial MX500 in random read and write IOPS, making it a better choice for demanding applications that involve frequent small-file operations, such as video editing and database management.
- The Samsung 870 QVO is typically more affordable, especially for larger capacities, while the Crucial MX500 offers superior performance at a slightly higher cost.
In the realm of solid-state drives (SSDs), the Crucial MX500 and Samsung 870 QVO stand as two formidable contenders. Both offer impressive performance and reliability, but they differ in certain key aspects that may influence your choice. This comprehensive comparison will delve into the intricacies of these two SSDs, highlighting their strengths, weaknesses, and suitability for various use cases.
Performance
Sequential Read/Write Speeds:
| SSD | Sequential Read (MB/s) | Sequential Write (MB/s) |
| — | — | — |
| Crucial MX500 | Up to 560 | Up to 510 |
| Samsung 870 QVO | Up to 560 | Up to 530 |
The Crucial MX500 and Samsung 870 QVO offer comparable sequential read and write speeds, with both delivering excellent performance for tasks such as loading games, opening large files, and transferring data.
Random Read/Write Speeds (IOPS):
| SSD | Random Read IOPS | Random Write IOPS |
| — | — | — |
| Crucial MX500 | Up to 95,000 | Up to 90,000 |
| Samsung 870 QVO | Up to 98,000 | Up to 88,000 |
The Samsung 870 QVO slightly edges out the Crucial MX500 in random read and write IOPS, making it a better choice for demanding applications that involve frequent small-file operations, such as video editing and database management.
Endurance and Reliability
Endurance:
| SSD | Endurance (TBW) |
| — | — |
| Crucial MX500 | 180-700 |
| Samsung 870 QVO | 150-300 |
The Crucial MX500 offers higher endurance ratings than the Samsung 870 QVO, indicating its ability to handle heavier workloads and write-intensive tasks before reaching its end of life.
Warranty:
| SSD | Warranty |
| — | — |
| Crucial MX500 | 5 years |
| Samsung 870 QVO | 3 years |
Both the Crucial MX500 and Samsung 870 QVO come with generous warranties, providing peace of mind and protection against potential failures.
Technology and Features
Cell Type:
| SSD | Cell Type |
| — | — |
| Crucial MX500 | TLC (Triple-Level Cell) |
| Samsung 870 QVO | QLC (Quad-Level Cell) |
The Crucial MX500 uses TLC NAND flash, while the Samsung 870 QVO employs QLC NAND flash. QLC technology allows for higher storage density, resulting in lower prices for larger capacities. However, TLC NAND offers better performance and endurance than QLC NAND.
DRAM Cache:
| SSD | DRAM Cache |
| — | — |
| Crucial MX500 | Yes |
| Samsung 870 QVO | No |
The Crucial MX500 features a dedicated DRAM cache, which enhances performance by storing frequently accessed data. The Samsung 870 QVO does not have a DRAM cache, which may result in slightly slower performance in some scenarios.
Capacity and Pricing
| SSD | Capacity | Price |
| — | — | — |
| Crucial MX500 | 250GB – 2TB | $30 – $190 |
| Samsung 870 QVO | 1TB – 8TB | $110 – $1,000 |
The Crucial MX500 is available in a wider range of capacities than the Samsung 870 QVO, with prices varying accordingly. The Samsung 870 QVO offers larger capacity options (up to 8TB), but at a premium price.
Suitability and Use Cases
Crucial MX500:
- Ideal for power users, gamers, and professionals who require high performance and endurance.
- Suitable for tasks such as gaming, video editing, and software development.
- Recommended for laptops and desktops that prioritize performance.
Samsung 870 QVO:
- Excellent choice for budget-conscious users and those who need large storage capacities.
- Suitable for general computing, web browsing, and office applications.
- Ideal for everyday use in laptops and desktops that do not require extreme performance.
The Verdict: Which SSD Should You Choose?
The Crucial MX500 and Samsung 870 QVO are both excellent SSDs, but they cater to different user needs and use cases. If you prioritize performance, endurance, and a DRAM cache, the Crucial MX500 is the better choice. If you value budget-friendly pricing and large storage capacities, the Samsung 870 QVO is a solid option.
Ultimately, the best SSD for you depends on your specific requirements and budget. By carefully considering the factors discussed in this comparison, you can make an informed decision that meets your needs.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Which SSD has a longer warranty?
A: The Crucial MX500 has a 5-year warranty, while the Samsung 870 QVO has a 3-year warranty.
Q: Which SSD is better for gaming?
A: The Crucial MX500 is generally better for gaming due to its higher endurance and performance in demanding applications.
Q: Which SSD is more affordable?
A: The Samsung 870 QVO is typically more affordable, especially for larger capacities, while the Crucial MX500 offers superior performance at a slightly higher cost.
Q: Which SSD is better for general computing?
A: Both the Crucial MX500 and Samsung 870 QVO are suitable for general computing, but the Samsung 870 QVO may be a more budget-friendly option for everyday use.
Q: Which SSD has a higher capacity?
A: The Samsung 870 QVO offers larger capacity options, up to 8TB, while the Crucial MX500 is available in capacities up to 2TB.
