What To Know
- Both the Threadripper PRO 5995WX and the Xeon Platinum 8380 support quad-channel memory, but the Threadripper PRO 5995WX has a higher maximum memory capacity of 2TB compared to the Xeon Platinum 8380’s 1TB.
- In Cinebench R23, the Threadripper PRO 5995WX achieved a score of 129,000 points in the multi-threaded test, while the Xeon Platinum 8380 scored 95,000 points.
- In Blender, the Threadripper PRO 5995WX rendered a scene in 2 minutes and 30 seconds, while the Xeon Platinum 8380 took 3 minutes and 10 seconds.
The realm of high-performance computing is constantly evolving, with AMD and Intel vying for supremacy. Two of their latest offerings, the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and the Intel Xeon, have emerged as contenders in the race for ultimate processing prowess. In this comprehensive comparison, we will delve into the intricacies of these two formidable processors, examining their key features, performance benchmarks, and target applications.
Core Count and Thread Count
The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX boasts an astonishing 64 cores and 128 threads, while the Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 offers 40 cores and 80 threads. This significant difference in core count gives the Threadripper PRO 5995WX a substantial advantage in highly parallelized workloads that can leverage its massive processing power.
Clock Speed and IPC
The Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 has a higher base clock speed of 2.3GHz compared to the Threadripper PRO 5995WX’s 2.7GHz. However, the Threadripper PRO 5995WX’s Zen 3 architecture features a higher IPC (instructions per cycle), allowing it to execute more instructions per clock cycle. This results in a performance advantage for the Threadripper PRO 5995WX in many applications.
Cache Memory
The Threadripper PRO 5995WX has a larger L3 cache (256MB) than the Xeon Platinum 8380 (27.5MB). This significantly larger cache allows the Threadripper PRO 5995WX to store more frequently accessed data, reducing the need to access slower memory and improving overall performance.
Memory Support
Both the Threadripper PRO 5995WX and the Xeon Platinum 8380 support quad-channel memory, but the Threadripper PRO 5995WX has a higher maximum memory capacity of 2TB compared to the Xeon Platinum 8380’s 1TB. This increased memory capacity allows the Threadripper PRO 5995WX to handle larger datasets and memory-intensive applications.
Performance Benchmarks
In various performance benchmarks, the Threadripper PRO 5995WX has consistently outperformed the Xeon Platinum 8380. In Cinebench R23, the Threadripper PRO 5995WX achieved a score of 129,000 points in the multi-threaded test, while the Xeon Platinum 8380 scored 95,000 points. In Blender, the Threadripper PRO 5995WX rendered a scene in 2 minutes and 30 seconds, while the Xeon Platinum 8380 took 3 minutes and 10 seconds.
Target Applications
The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX is ideal for highly parallelized workloads such as video editing, 3D rendering, scientific simulations, and database management. Its massive core count and large cache memory make it a formidable choice for applications that demand extreme processing power. The Intel Xeon Platinum 8380, on the other hand, is better suited for applications that require high single-threaded performance, such as enterprise software, virtualization, and cloud computing.
Power Consumption and Thermal Performance
The Threadripper PRO 5995WX has a TDP (thermal design power) of 280W, while the Xeon Platinum 8380 has a TDP of 270W. Both processors require robust cooling solutions to maintain optimal performance under heavy loads.
Price and Availability
The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX is priced at $6,499, while the Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 costs approximately $5,999. Both processors are available through authorized resellers and system builders.
The Verdict
The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and the Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 are both exceptional processors that cater to different segments of the high-performance computing market. The Threadripper PRO 5995WX offers unparalleled core count and cache memory, making it the ideal choice for highly parallelized workloads that demand extreme processing power. The Xeon Platinum 8380, on the other hand, excels in applications that require high single-threaded performance and enterprise-grade reliability. Ultimately, the best choice between these two processors depends on the specific requirements and budget of the user.
Frequently Discussed Topics
1. Which processor is better for gaming?
Neither the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX nor the Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 is specifically designed for gaming. Gaming performance is primarily determined by the graphics card.
2. Which processor is more energy efficient?
Both processors have comparable power consumption, with TDPs of 280W and 270W, respectively.
3. Which processor has better support for virtualization?
The Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 has better support for virtualization technologies such as VT-x and VT-d, making it a more suitable choice for virtualization workloads.
