What To Know
- The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX features an astounding 64 cores and 128 threads, while the AMD EPYC 9654 boasts an equally impressive 128 cores and 256 threads.
- The EPYC 9654 has a significantly larger total cache of 512 MB, consisting of 64 MB of L1 cache, 1 MB of L2 cache per core (for a total of 128 MB), and 32 MB of L3 cache per core (for a total of 4 MB).
- The Threadripper PRO 5995WX has a TDP of 280W, while the EPYC 9654 has a TDP of 320W.
In the realm of high-performance computing, AMD’s Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and EPYC 9654 processors stand tall as formidable contenders for workstation supremacy. Both processors boast an impressive array of features and capabilities, but each caters to distinct needs and applications. To help you make an informed decision, we present a comprehensive comparison of these two workstation powerhouses.
Core Count and Thread Count
The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX features an astounding 64 cores and 128 threads, while the AMD EPYC 9654 boasts an equally impressive 128 cores and 256 threads. The higher core count of the EPYC 9654 grants it a significant advantage in heavily multithreaded workloads, such as intensive simulations and data analysis.
Clock Speed and Turbo Boost
The Threadripper PRO 5995WX has a base clock speed of 3.7 GHz and a boost clock speed of up to 4.5 GHz. The EPYC 9654, on the other hand, has a slightly lower base clock speed of 2.8 GHz but can boost up to an impressive 3.6 GHz. While the Threadripper PRO 5995WX has a higher maximum boost clock speed, the EPYC 9654’s lower base clock speed may result in better sustained performance under sustained heavy workloads.
Cache Size
The Threadripper PRO 5995WX features 288 MB of total cache, including 64 MB of L1 cache, 512 MB of L2 cache, and 256 MB of L3 cache. The EPYC 9654 has a significantly larger total cache of 512 MB, consisting of 64 MB of L1 cache, 1 MB of L2 cache per core (for a total of 128 MB), and 32 MB of L3 cache per core (for a total of 4 MB). The EPYC 9654’s larger L3 cache size provides an advantage in applications that heavily rely on large datasets.
Memory Support
The Threadripper PRO 5995WX supports up to 2 TB of DDR4-3200 memory in an octa-channel configuration. The EPYC 9654 supports up to 2 TB of DDR4-3200 memory in a quad-channel configuration. While the Threadripper PRO 5995WX has a higher maximum memory capacity, the EPYC 9654’s quad-channel memory configuration may offer better memory bandwidth for certain applications.
PCIe Lanes
The Threadripper PRO 5995WX provides 128 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, while the EPYC 9654 offers an astonishing 160 PCIe Gen 4 lanes. The EPYC 9654’s higher number of PCIe lanes provides greater flexibility for connecting multiple high-performance devices, such as graphics cards, storage drives, and network cards.
Platform Compatibility
The Threadripper PRO 5995WX is designed for use with the WRX80 motherboard platform, while the EPYC 9654 requires a compatible EPYC motherboard platform. Both platforms offer a range of features and capabilities, so the choice of motherboard will depend on the specific requirements of your workstation.
Power Consumption and Thermal Management
The Threadripper PRO 5995WX has a TDP of 280W, while the EPYC 9654 has a TDP of 320W. The higher TDP of the EPYC 9654 indicates that it requires more power and cooling than the Threadripper PRO 5995WX. Proper thermal management is crucial to ensure optimal performance and reliability of these high-performance processors.
Performance Comparison
In terms of performance, both the Threadripper PRO 5995WX and the EPYC 9654 excel in their respective domains. The Threadripper PRO 5995WX is particularly well-suited for applications that benefit from high core counts and clock speeds, such as 3D rendering, video editing, and gaming. The EPYC 9654, with its massive core count and large cache size, excels in heavily multithreaded workloads, such as scientific simulations, machine learning, and data analytics.
In a nutshell: Choosing the Right Processor for Your Workstation
The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and the AMD EPYC 9654 are both exceptional processors that cater to different workstation needs. If your primary focus is on high core counts, clock speeds, and single-threaded performance, the Threadripper PRO 5995WX is an excellent choice. However, if your workloads demand massive multithreading capabilities and large cache sizes, the EPYC 9654 is the clear winner. Ultimately, the best choice for you will depend on the specific applications you run and the performance requirements of your workstation.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Which processor has a higher maximum boost clock speed?
A: The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX has a higher maximum boost clock speed of up to 4.5 GHz, compared to the EPYC 9654’s boost clock speed of up to 3.6 GHz.
Q: Which processor supports more PCIe lanes?
A: The AMD EPYC 9654 provides 160 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, while the Threadripper PRO 5995WX offers 128 PCIe Gen 4 lanes.
Q: Which processor has a lower TDP?
A: The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX has a TDP of 280W, while the EPYC 9654 has a TDP of 320W.
