Amd Radeon R7 240 4gb Vs Nvidia Geforce Gt 730 4gb
What To Know
- In this comprehensive comparison, we delve into the key differences between the R7 240 and GT 730, providing you with all the insights you need to make an informed decision.
- Based on our comprehensive comparison, the AMD Radeon R7 240 4GB emerges as the clear winner over the NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 4GB.
- It offers superior performance in synthetic benchmarks and real-world gaming, has a wider memory bus, and supports a newer version of DirectX.
In the realm of budget-friendly gaming, the AMD Radeon R7 240 4GB and NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 4GB stand as two popular choices. These graphics cards offer a balance between performance and affordability, making them ideal for casual gamers and entry-level enthusiasts. In this comprehensive comparison, we delve into the key differences between the R7 240 and GT 730, providing you with all the insights you need to make an informed decision.
Performance Comparison
Synthetic Benchmarks
Synthetic benchmarks provide a controlled environment to measure the raw performance of graphics cards. In 3DMark Fire Strike, the R7 240 scores 3,349 points, while the GT 730 lags behind with 2,456 points. This indicates a significant performance advantage for the R7 240 in synthetic workloads.
Gaming Performance
In real-world gaming scenarios, the R7 240 maintains its lead over the GT 730. In popular titles such as League of Legends, Overwatch, and Fortnite, the R7 240 delivers consistently higher frame rates at medium to high settings. The GT 730, on the other hand, struggles to maintain playable frame rates in these games at similar settings.
Memory and Bandwidth
Both the R7 240 and GT 730 feature 4GB of GDDR5 memory, which is sufficient for most budget-friendly games. However, the R7 240 has a wider memory bus (128-bit) compared to the GT 730’s 64-bit bus. This wider bus allows for faster data transfer rates, resulting in improved performance in memory-intensive applications.
Power Consumption and Cooling
The R7 240 consumes slightly more power than the GT 730, with a TDP of 65W compared to 52W. However, both cards are relatively energy-efficient and do not require external power connectors. Both cards also utilize passive cooling solutions, eliminating the need for noisy fans.
Features and Compatibility
The R7 240 supports DirectX 11.2 and OpenGL 4.5, while the GT 730 is limited to DirectX 11.1 and OpenGL 4.4. This difference may not be significant for most games, but it could affect compatibility with certain newer titles. Both cards are compatible with PCI Express 2.0 motherboards.
Pricing and Availability
The R7 240 and GT 730 are both available at similar price points, typically ranging from $60 to $80. Availability may vary depending on your region and retailer.
In a nutshell: The Winner is…
Based on our comprehensive comparison, the AMD Radeon R7 240 4GB emerges as the clear winner over the NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 4GB. It offers superior performance in synthetic benchmarks and real-world gaming, has a wider memory bus, and supports a newer version of DirectX. While the GT 730 is slightly more energy-efficient, it cannot match the R7 240’s overall performance and value proposition. Therefore, for budget-minded gamers looking for the best possible experience, the AMD Radeon R7 240 4GB is the recommended choice.
Answers to Your Questions
1. Is the R7 240 suitable for 1080p gaming?
Yes, the R7 240 can handle 1080p gaming at medium to low settings in most games.
2. Can the GT 730 run modern games?
Yes, the GT 730 can run modern games at low settings, but frame rates may be limited in demanding titles.
3. Which card has better driver support?
Both AMD and NVIDIA provide regular driver updates for their graphics cards, ensuring compatibility with the latest games and operating systems.
4. Is the R7 240 compatible with my motherboard?
Check the specifications of your motherboard to ensure that it has a PCI Express 2.0 slot.
5. How much power does the GT 730 consume?
The GT 730 has a TDP of 52W and does not require an external power connector.