Amd Radeon 520 Vs. Nvidia 940mx: The Affordable Gpu Comparison Guide
What To Know
- However, the 940MX has a slight edge in performance, especially in games that heavily utilize CUDA cores, such as The Witcher 3 and Grand Theft Auto V.
- The AMD Radeon 520 and NVIDIA GeForce 940MX support a range of features and technologies that enhance gaming and creative experiences.
- The Radeon 520 offers a slightly lower price and power consumption, while the 940MX provides a slight performance edge in some games and creative applications.
The AMD Radeon 520 and NVIDIA GeForce 940MX are two entry-level graphics cards that have been popular choices for budget-minded gamers and creative professionals. While both cards offer similar performance levels, there are some key differences that may influence your choice. In this comprehensive comparison, we will delve into the specifications, performance, power consumption, and other aspects of these two graphics cards to help you make an informed decision.
Specifications Comparison
Feature | AMD Radeon 520 | NVIDIA GeForce 940MX |
— | — | — |
GPU Architecture | Polaris 12 | Maxwell 2 |
Core Clock Speed | 1124 MHz | 1176 MHz |
Boost Clock Speed | 1247 MHz | 1291 MHz |
CUDA Cores (NVIDIA only) | N/A | 384 |
Stream Processors (AMD only) | 512 | N/A |
Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Memory Capacity | 2GB | 2GB |
Memory Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
TDP | 25W | 36W |
Performance Comparison
In terms of gaming performance, the AMD Radeon 520 and NVIDIA GeForce 940MX are fairly comparable. Both cards can handle most modern games at low to medium graphics settings. However, the 940MX has a slight edge in performance, especially in games that heavily utilize CUDA cores, such as The Witcher 3 and Grand Theft Auto V.
For creative professionals, the Radeon 520 and 940MX offer similar levels of performance in most applications. However, the 940MX may provide a slight advantage in video editing and rendering tasks, thanks to its dedicated CUDA cores.
Power Consumption
The AMD Radeon 520 has a lower TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 25W, compared to the NVIDIA GeForce 940MX’s 36W TDP. This means that the Radeon 520 will consume less power and generate less heat, making it a more suitable choice for laptops and other portable devices.
Features and Technologies
The AMD Radeon 520 and NVIDIA GeForce 940MX support a range of features and technologies that enhance gaming and creative experiences. These include:
- AMD FreeSync: Reduces screen tearing and stuttering in games.
- NVIDIA GameWorks: Provides access to exclusive gaming technologies and optimizations.
- CUDA: NVIDIA’s parallel computing platform for accelerating performance in various applications.
- OpenGL 4.5: Support for the latest graphics API.
Form Factor
The AMD Radeon 520 and NVIDIA GeForce 940MX are available in both desktop and laptop variants. The desktop variants are typically larger and more powerful, while the laptop variants are designed for thin and light devices.
Price and Availability
The AMD Radeon 520 and NVIDIA GeForce 940MX are both budget-friendly graphics cards. The Radeon 520 is generally priced slightly lower than the 940MX. Both cards are widely available from online retailers and computer hardware stores.
Takeaways
The AMD Radeon 520 and NVIDIA GeForce 940MX are both solid choices for budget-conscious gamers and creative professionals. The Radeon 520 offers a slightly lower price and power consumption, while the 940MX provides a slight performance edge in some games and creative applications. Ultimately, the best choice for you will depend on your specific requirements and budget.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Which graphics card is better for gaming, the Radeon 520 or the 940MX?
A: The 940MX has a slight edge in gaming performance, especially in games that utilize CUDA cores.
Q: Which graphics card is more power-efficient?
A: The Radeon 520 has a lower TDP of 25W, compared to the 940MX’s 36W TDP.
Q: Which graphics card is better for video editing?
A: The 940MX may provide a slight advantage in video editing and rendering tasks, thanks to its dedicated CUDA cores.