What To Know
- The AMD Radeon 520 is available as a dedicated graphics card, while the Intel UHD 620 is an integrated graphics solution.
- However, the Radeon 520 offers better performance in gaming and video playback, while the Intel UHD 620 is more energy-efficient and compatible with a wider range of systems.
- The Intel UHD 620 is more energy-efficient than the AMD Radeon 520, making it a better choice for laptops and other portable devices.
In the realm of budget-friendly graphics, the AMD Radeon 520 and Intel UHD 620 stand out as competitive options. Both integrated graphics solutions offer a balance of performance and affordability, but understanding their key differences is crucial for making an informed decision. This comprehensive blog post delves into the details of AMD Radeon 520 vs Intel UHD 620, guiding you through the technical specifications, performance benchmarks, and real-world applications to help you determine the best graphics solution for your needs.
Technical Specifications
| Feature | AMD Radeon 520 | Intel UHD 620 |
| — | — | — |
| Graphics Processor | Polaris 12 | Intel Gen9 |
| Core Count | 384 | 24 |
| Clock Speed | Up to 1124 MHz | Up to 1050 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 64-bit GDDR5 | 64-bit DDR3/DDR4 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s |
| TDP | 25W | 15W |
Performance Benchmarks
3DMark Fire Strike
- AMD Radeon 520: 1,120
- Intel UHD 620: 640
Unigine Valley
- AMD Radeon 520: 635
- Intel UHD 620: 360
Game Benchmarks
| Game | AMD Radeon 520 | Intel UHD 620 |
| — | — | — |
| League of Legends | 80 FPS | 60 FPS |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 60 FPS | 45 FPS |
| Rocket League | 45 FPS | 30 FPS |
Real-World Applications
Video Playback
Both the AMD Radeon 520 and Intel UHD 620 support 4K video playback. However, the Radeon 520 offers better decoding capabilities, resulting in smoother playback of high-resolution videos.
Casual Gaming
For casual gamers, the AMD Radeon 520 provides a better experience than the Intel UHD 620. Its higher core count and memory bandwidth enable it to handle more demanding games at playable frame rates.
Basic Photo Editing
Both graphics solutions are suitable for basic photo editing tasks. However, the Radeon 520’s dedicated graphics memory provides a slight edge in performance for more complex editing operations.
Other Considerations
Power Consumption
The Intel UHD 620 has a lower TDP rating than the AMD Radeon 520, making it more energy-efficient. This can be an important factor for laptops and other portable devices.
Compatibility
The AMD Radeon 520 is available as a dedicated graphics card, while the Intel UHD 620 is an integrated graphics solution. This means that the Radeon 520 can be paired with a wider range of CPUs and motherboards.
Upgradeability
The AMD Radeon 520 is a dedicated graphics card, which means it can be upgraded or replaced in the future. The Intel UHD 620, on the other hand, is integrated into the motherboard and cannot be upgraded.
Verdict: AMD Radeon 520 vs Intel UHD 620
The AMD Radeon 520 and Intel UHD 620 are both capable budget-friendly graphics solutions. However, the Radeon 520 offers better performance in gaming and video playback, while the Intel UHD 620 is more energy-efficient and compatible with a wider range of systems.
Ultimately, the best choice depends on your specific needs and priorities. If you prioritize performance, the AMD Radeon 520 is the better option. If you value energy efficiency and compatibility, the Intel UHD 620 is a solid choice.
What You Need to Know
Q: Which graphics solution is better for 1080p gaming?
A: The AMD Radeon 520 offers better performance in 1080p gaming than the Intel UHD 620.
Q: Can I use the Intel UHD 620 for video editing?
A: Yes, the Intel UHD 620 can be used for basic video editing tasks. However, it may struggle with more complex editing operations.
Q: Which graphics solution is more suitable for a laptop?
A: The Intel UHD 620 is more energy-efficient than the AMD Radeon 520, making it a better choice for laptops and other portable devices.
