What To Know
- The AMD FX-8350 is based on the older Bulldozer architecture, while the Ryzen 9 3900X is based on the newer Zen 2 architecture.
- The AMD FX-8350 is an older processor that is based on the Bulldozer architecture, while the Ryzen 9 3900X is a newer processor that is based on the Zen 2 architecture.
- The Ryzen 9 3900X has a number of advantages over the AMD FX-8350, including a higher core count, a higher clock speed, more cache, and a lower power consumption.
In the world of computing, the battle between AMD and Intel has been raging for decades. Both companies have released a series of powerful processors, and the latest contenders are the AMD FX-8350 and the Ryzen 9 3900X. In this blog post, we will compare these two processors and see which one comes out on top.
Architecture
The AMD FX-8350 is based on the older Bulldozer architecture, while the Ryzen 9 3900X is based on the newer Zen 2 architecture. The Zen 2 architecture is a significant improvement over Bulldozer, and it offers better performance and power efficiency.
Core Count
The AMD FX-8350 has eight cores, while the Ryzen 9 3900X has 12 cores. More cores can improve performance in certain applications, such as video editing and rendering. However, it is important to note that not all applications can take advantage of multiple cores.
Clock Speed
The AMD FX-8350 has a base clock speed of 4.0 GHz, while the Ryzen 9 3900X has a base clock speed of 3.8 GHz. However, the Ryzen 9 3900X can boost up to 4.6 GHz, while the AMD FX-8350 can only boost up to 4.2 GHz. This means that the Ryzen 9 3900X will have a higher performance in single-threaded applications.
Cache
The AMD FX-8350 has 8 MB of L3 cache, while the Ryzen 9 3900X has 64 MB of L3 cache. More cache can improve performance in applications that require frequent access to data.
Power Consumption
The AMD FX-8350 has a TDP of 125W, while the Ryzen 9 3900X has a TDP of 105W. This means that the Ryzen 9 3900X is more power efficient than the AMD FX-8350.
Price
The AMD FX-8350 is available for around $100, while the Ryzen 9 3900X is available for around $500. This means that the AMD FX-8350 is a much more affordable option.
The Bottom Line: AMD FX-8350 vs Ryzen 9 3900X
The AMD FX-8350 and the Ryzen 9 3900X are two very different processors. The AMD FX-8350 is an older processor that is based on the Bulldozer architecture, while the Ryzen 9 3900X is a newer processor that is based on the Zen 2 architecture. The Ryzen 9 3900X has a number of advantages over the AMD FX-8350, including a higher core count, a higher clock speed, more cache, and a lower power consumption. However, the AMD FX-8350 is a much more affordable option.
Top Questions Asked
1. Which processor is better for gaming?
The Ryzen 9 3900X is better for gaming than the AMD FX-8350. The Ryzen 9 3900X has a higher core count and a higher clock speed, which gives it a significant performance advantage in games.
2. Which processor is better for video editing?
The Ryzen 9 3900X is also better for video editing than the AMD FX-8350. The Ryzen 9 3900X has a higher core count and more cache, which gives it a significant performance advantage in video editing applications.
3. Which processor is better for multitasking?
The Ryzen 9 3900X is better for multitasking than the AMD FX-8350. The Ryzen 9 3900X has a higher core count and a higher clock speed, which gives it a significant performance advantage in multitasking applications.
