Amd Fx-8320 Vs Ryzen 3 3200g

When it comes to choosing a budget-friendly processor, the AMD FX-8320 and Ryzen 3 3200G are two popular options. Both offer a combination of performance and value, but which one is the right choice for your needs? In this blog post, we’ll compare the AMD FX-8320 vs Ryzen 3 3200G in terms of their specifications, performance, and value, to help you make an informed decision.

Specifications

AMD FX-8320

• Architecture: Vishera
• Cores: 8
• Threads: 8
• Clock Speed: 3.5 GHz (base), 4.0 GHz (turbo)
• Cache: 8 MB L3
• TDP: 125W
• Socket: AM3+

Ryzen 3 3200G

• Architecture: Zen+
• Cores: 4
• Threads: 4
• Clock Speed: 3.6 GHz (base), 4.0 GHz (turbo)
• Cache: 6 MB L3
• TDP: 65W
• Socket: AM4

Performance

In terms of raw performance, the Ryzen 3 3200G has a clear advantage over the AMD FX-8320. This is due to its more modern architecture, which results in better instructions per clock (IPC) performance.

In single-threaded applications, the Ryzen 3 3200G is about 15-20% faster than the AMD FX-8320. In multi-threaded applications, the Ryzen 3 3200G is also faster, but the difference is not as significant as in single-threaded applications.

Gaming Performance

When it comes to gaming, the Ryzen 3 3200G has a clear advantage over the AMD FX-8320, thanks to its more powerful integrated graphics. The Ryzen 3 3200G’s integrated Radeon Vega 8 graphics is about 50-60% faster than the AMD FX-8320’s integrated Radeon R7 graphics.

This means that the Ryzen 3 3200G can play games at higher resolutions and frame rates than the AMD FX-8320. However, it’s important to note that the Ryzen 3 3200G is still not a gaming powerhouse, and it will struggle to play demanding games at high settings.

Features

The Ryzen 3 3200G has a number of features that the AMD FX-8320 does not have, including:

• Support for DDR4 memory: The Ryzen 3 3200G supports DDR4 memory, which is faster and more efficient than DDR3 memory.
• Integrated graphics: The Ryzen 3 3200G has integrated Radeon Vega 8 graphics, which is more powerful than the integrated graphics found in the AMD FX-8320.
• PCIe 3.0 support: The Ryzen 3 3200G supports PCIe 3.0, which is a faster expansion bus than PCIe 2.0.

Value

In terms of value, the Ryzen 3 3200G is the better choice. It offers better performance than the AMD FX-8320, it has more features, and it is more energy-efficient.

The Ryzen 3 3200G is also more affordable than the AMD FX-8320. You can find the Ryzen 3 3200G for around $100, while the AMD FX-8320 costs around $150.

Which One Should You Choose?

If you’re looking for a budget-friendly processor that offers good performance and value, the Ryzen 3 3200G is the better choice. It offers better performance than the AMD FX-8320, it has more features, and it is more energy-efficient.

The AMD FX-8320 is only a good choice if you’re on a very tight budget and you don’t need the best possible performance.

Takeaways: The Ryzen 3 3200G is the Better Choice

In our opinion, the Ryzen 3 3200G is the better choice for most people. It offers better performance, more features, and better value than the AMD FX-8320.

If you’re looking for a budget-friendly processor that will give you good performance in both gaming and productivity applications, the Ryzen 3 3200G is the best choice.

Answers to Your Questions

Q: Which processor is better for gaming, the AMD FX-8320 or the Ryzen 3 3200G?

A: The Ryzen 3 3200G is better for gaming than the AMD FX-8320, thanks to its more powerful integrated graphics.

Q: Which processor is better for productivity applications, the AMD FX-8320 or the Ryzen 3 3200G?

A: The Ryzen 3 3200G is better for productivity applications than the AMD FX-8320, thanks to its better IPC performance.

Q: Which processor is more energy-efficient, the AMD FX-8320 or the Ryzen 3 3200G?

A: The Ryzen 3 3200G is more energy-efficient than the AMD FX-8320, thanks to its lower TDP.