Fixing, upgrading and optimizing PCs
Guide

Amd Fx 4350 Vs Ryzen 3 5300u

Michael is the owner and chief editor of MichaelPCGuy.com. He has over 15 years of experience fixing, upgrading, and optimizing personal computers. Michael started his career working as a computer technician at a local repair shop where he learned invaluable skills for hardware and software troubleshooting. In his free time,...

What To Know

  • In contrast, the Ryzen 3 5300U is built on the Zen 2 architecture and boasts four cores and eight threads, with a base clock speed of 2.
  • For example, in Fortnite at 1080p with low settings, the Ryzen 3 5300U can achieve an average frame rate of around 60 FPS, while the FX-4350 struggles to maintain a stable 30 FPS.
  • The Ryzen 3 5300U has a lower TDP than the FX-4350, but it is still recommended to use a good cooling solution for optimal performance.

The world of processors has witnessed a significant evolution over the years, with AMD’s FX-4350 and Ryzen 3 5300U representing two distinct generations. The former, released in 2012, belongs to the FX series, while the latter, launched in 2020, is part of the Ryzen 3 family. This blog post will delve into a comprehensive comparison of these two processors, exploring their key specifications, performance benchmarks, and suitability for different use cases.

Architecture and Core Count

The AMD FX-4350 is based on the Vishera microarchitecture and features four cores with a clock speed of up to 4.2 GHz. It utilizes the older Socket AM3+ platform. In contrast, the Ryzen 3 5300U is built on the Zen 2 architecture and boasts four cores and eight threads, with a base clock speed of 2.6 GHz and a boost clock speed of up to 3.8 GHz. It supports the modern Socket AM4 platform.

Cache and Memory

The FX-4350 has a relatively small cache configuration, with 4 MB of L2 cache and 8 MB of L3 cache. The Ryzen 3 5300U, on the other hand, has a more generous cache layout, with 2 MB of L2 cache per core and 8 MB of L3 cache. Additionally, the Ryzen 3 5300U supports faster memory speeds, up to DDR4-3200, while the FX-4350 is limited to DDR3-1866.

Performance Benchmarks

In terms of performance, the Ryzen 3 5300U outperforms the FX-4350 in most synthetic benchmarks. In the Cinebench R23 single-core test, the Ryzen 3 5300U scores around 1100 points, while the FX-4350 scores around 500 points. In the multi-core test, the Ryzen 3 5300U scores around 4000 points, compared to the FX-4350’s score of around 1800 points.

Gaming Performance

In real-world gaming scenarios, the Ryzen 3 5300U also holds an advantage over the FX-4350. For example, in Fortnite at 1080p with low settings, the Ryzen 3 5300U can achieve an average frame rate of around 60 FPS, while the FX-4350 struggles to maintain a stable 30 FPS.

Power Consumption and Efficiency

The Ryzen 3 5300U is designed with power efficiency in mind, utilizing a 15-watt TDP (Thermal Design Power). In contrast, the FX-4350 has a TDP of 125 watts, indicating significantly higher power consumption. This difference is particularly relevant for laptops and other portable devices.

Suitability for Different Use Cases

The AMD FX-4350 is suitable for basic computing tasks such as web browsing, email, and light office work. It is not recommended for demanding applications like video editing, gaming, or multitasking. The Ryzen 3 5300U, on the other hand, is a more versatile processor that can handle a wider range of workloads, including casual gaming, content creation, and productivity tasks.

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 3 5300U is the clear winner in this comparison. It offers superior performance, efficiency, and versatility compared to the AMD FX-4350. While the FX-4350 may still be suitable for basic tasks, the Ryzen 3 5300U is the better choice for most users, especially those who value performance, portability, and energy efficiency.

Considerations Before Upgrading

Before upgrading from the AMD FX-4350 to the Ryzen 3 5300U, it is important to consider the following:

  • Motherboard Compatibility: The Ryzen 3 5300U requires a motherboard with a Socket AM4 socket, while the FX-4350 uses a Socket AM3+ socket.
  • Memory Compatibility: The Ryzen 3 5300U supports faster memory speeds, so you may need to upgrade your RAM as well.
  • Cooling: The Ryzen 3 5300U has a lower TDP than the FX-4350, but it is still recommended to use a good cooling solution for optimal performance.

Frequently Discussed Topics

1. Which processor is better for gaming, the AMD FX-4350 or the Ryzen 3 5300U?

The Ryzen 3 5300U is significantly better for gaming due to its higher core count, faster clock speeds, and more efficient architecture.

2. Can the AMD FX-4350 be overclocked?

Yes, the AMD FX-4350 can be overclocked to achieve higher performance, but it is important to use a stable overclock and ensure proper cooling.

3. Is the Ryzen 3 5300U suitable for streaming?

The Ryzen 3 5300U can handle basic streaming tasks, but it may struggle with high-resolution or high-bitrate streaming.

Was this page helpful?

Michael

Michael is the owner and chief editor of MichaelPCGuy.com. He has over 15 years of experience fixing, upgrading, and optimizing personal computers. Michael started his career working as a computer technician at a local repair shop where he learned invaluable skills for hardware and software troubleshooting. In his free time, Michael enjoys tinkering with computers and staying on top of the latest tech innovations. He launched MichaelPCGuy.com to share his knowledge with others and help them get the most out of their PCs. Whether someone needs virus removal, a hardware upgrade, or tips for better performance, Michael is here to help solve any computer issues. When he's not working on computers, Michael likes playing video games and spending time with his family. He believes the proper maintenance and care is key to keeping a PC running smoothly for many years. Michael is committed to providing straightforward solutions and guidance to readers of his blog. If you have a computer problem, MichaelPCGuy.com is the place to find an answer.
Back to top button