What To Know
- In the realm of high-performance computing, the choice between AMD EPYC 7R13 and Skylake 8175M processors becomes crucial for businesses seeking optimal performance and efficiency.
- The EPYC 7R13 has a TDP of 155W, while the 8175M has a TDP of 65W.
- The choice between the AMD EPYC 7R13 and Skylake 8175M depends on the specific requirements of the workload.
In the realm of high-performance computing, the choice between AMD EPYC 7R13 and Skylake 8175M processors becomes crucial for businesses seeking optimal performance and efficiency. This comprehensive comparison will delve into the key differences between these processors, providing insights into their strengths, weaknesses, and suitability for various workloads.
Architecture and Core Count
The AMD EPYC 7R13 is based on the Zen 2 architecture, featuring 16 cores and 32 threads. It operates at a base frequency of 2.4 GHz and can boost up to 3.4 GHz. In contrast, the Skylake 8175M is based on the Coffee Lake architecture and has 6 cores and 12 threads. It operates at a base frequency of 2.5 GHz and can boost up to 4.9 GHz.
Cache and Memory
The EPYC 7R13 boasts a larger cache size than the 8175M. It has 16 MB of L3 cache and 512 KB of L2 cache per core, totaling 12 MB. The 8175M has 12 MB of L3 cache and 256 KB of L2 cache per core, totaling 6 MB. Additionally, the EPYC 7R13 supports up to 1 TB of DDR4 memory, while the 8175M supports up to 128 GB of DDR4 memory.
Power Consumption
Power consumption is a critical factor for server-grade processors. The EPYC 7R13 has a TDP of 155W, while the 8175M has a TDP of 65W. This difference in power consumption is due to the higher core count and cache size of the EPYC 7R13.
Performance Benchmarks
Performance benchmarks provide quantifiable data on the capabilities of these processors. In single-threaded workloads, the 8175M typically performs better due to its higher clock speeds. However, in multi-threaded workloads, the EPYC 7R13 excels due to its higher core count and cache size.
Suitability for Workloads
The EPYC 7R13 is ideal for workloads that require high performance and scalability, such as virtualized environments, cloud computing, and data analytics. The 8175M is better suited for applications that prioritize single-threaded performance, such as gaming and desktop applications.
Cost and Availability
The EPYC 7R13 is a more expensive processor than the 8175M. However, its higher core count and cache size make it a better value for businesses that require high performance. The EPYC 7R13 is readily available, while the 8175M may have limited availability.
Summary: Making the Right Choice
The choice between the AMD EPYC 7R13 and Skylake 8175M depends on the specific requirements of the workload. For workloads that demand high performance, scalability, and multi-threaded capabilities, the EPYC 7R13 is the superior choice. For applications that prioritize single-threaded performance and power efficiency, the 8175M is a suitable option.
Common Questions and Answers
Q: Which processor is better for gaming?
A: The Skylake 8175M is better for gaming due to its higher clock speeds and single-threaded performance.
Q: Which processor is more power-efficient?
A: The Skylake 8175M is more power-efficient due to its lower TDP.
Q: Which processor is cheaper?
A: The Skylake 8175M is cheaper than the AMD EPYC 7R13.
