What To Know
- The AMD EPYC 7R13 has a TDP of 280W, while the Intel Ice Lake 8375C has a TDP of 270W.
- Both the AMD EPYC 7R13 and the Intel Ice Lake 8375C offer a range of features and technologies to enhance performance and security.
- The choice between the AMD EPYC 7R13 and the Intel Ice Lake 8375C depends on your specific requirements and workload.
The world of server processors is constantly evolving, with AMD and Intel vying for dominance. The latest offerings from these two tech giants are the AMD EPYC 7R13 and the Intel Ice Lake 8375C. Both processors promise impressive performance and capabilities, but which one is the better choice for your specific needs? In this comprehensive blog post, we will delve into a detailed comparison of the AMD EPYC 7R13 vs. Intel Ice Lake 8375C, covering their key features, performance benchmarks, and more.
Architecture and Core Count
The AMD EPYC 7R13 is based on the Zen 2 architecture and features 64 cores and 128 threads. The Intel Ice Lake 8375C, on the other hand, is based on the Sunny Cove architecture and has 40 cores and 80 threads. While the EPYC 7R13 has a higher core count, the Ice Lake 8375C’s Sunny Cove architecture offers improved single-core performance.
Clock Speed and Cache
The AMD EPYC 7R13 has a base clock speed of 2.4 GHz and a boost clock speed of 3.4 GHz. The Intel Ice Lake 8375C has a higher base clock speed of 3.0 GHz and a boost clock speed of 3.8 GHz. However, the EPYC 7R13 has a significantly larger cache size, with 256 MB of L3 cache compared to the Ice Lake 8375C’s 16 MB of L3 cache.
Memory and I/O
Both the AMD EPYC 7R13 and the Intel Ice Lake 8375C support eight channels of DDR4 memory. The EPYC 7R13 supports memory speeds up to 3200 MHz, while the Ice Lake 8375C supports speeds up to 2933 MHz. In terms of I/O, the EPYC 7R13 offers 128 PCIe 4.0 lanes, while the Ice Lake 8375C has 64 PCIe 4.0 lanes.
Performance Benchmarks
When it comes to performance, the AMD EPYC 7R13 and the Intel Ice Lake 8375C offer comparable results in most benchmarks. However, the EPYC 7R13 tends to perform better in multi-threaded applications, while the Ice Lake 8375C excels in single-threaded tasks.
Power Consumption and Efficiency
The AMD EPYC 7R13 has a TDP of 280W, while the Intel Ice Lake 8375C has a TDP of 270W. In terms of power efficiency, the EPYC 7R13 offers a slightly better performance-per-watt ratio.
Features and Technologies
Both the AMD EPYC 7R13 and the Intel Ice Lake 8375C offer a range of features and technologies to enhance performance and security. The EPYC 7R13 supports AMD Infinity Fabric, which provides high-speed interconnects between multiple processors and other components. The Ice Lake 8375C, on the other hand, features Intel Optane Persistent Memory, which offers a combination of high capacity and fast performance.
Pricing and Availability
The AMD EPYC 7R13 is priced at around $8,000, while the Intel Ice Lake 8375C is priced at around $9,000. Both processors are available from major server manufacturers and distributors.
Which Processor is Right for You?
The choice between the AMD EPYC 7R13 and the Intel Ice Lake 8375C depends on your specific requirements and workload. If you need a processor with a high core count and strong multi-threaded performance, the EPYC 7R13 is an excellent choice. However, if you prioritize single-core performance and power efficiency, the Ice Lake 8375C is a better option.
Beyond the Numbers: Real-World Use Cases
To provide a more practical perspective, let’s explore some real-world use cases where the AMD EPYC 7R13 and the Intel Ice Lake 8375C shine:
- Virtualization and Cloud Computing: The EPYC 7R13’s high core count and large cache size make it ideal for virtualization and cloud computing environments where multiple virtual machines are running concurrently.
- Database Management: The Ice Lake 8375C’s single-core performance and Optane Persistent Memory technology provide excellent support for database management systems that require fast access to large datasets.
- High-Performance Computing (HPC): The EPYC 7R13’s Infinity Fabric technology and high bandwidth memory support make it a suitable choice for HPC applications that require fast data transfer and communication between multiple nodes.
Final Thoughts: A Matter of Choice
The AMD EPYC 7R13 and the Intel Ice Lake 8375C are both formidable server processors that offer impressive performance and capabilities. The EPYC 7R13 excels in multi-threaded workloads, while the Ice Lake 8375C shines in single-threaded tasks. Ultimately, the best choice for you depends on your specific needs and preferences. By carefully considering the factors discussed in this comparison, you can make an informed decision that will maximize the performance and efficiency of your server infrastructure.
Popular Questions
1. Is the AMD EPYC 7R13 compatible with Intel motherboards?
No, the EPYC 7R13 is designed for AMD motherboards with an sTRX4 socket.
2. Which processor has better support for NVMe storage?
Both the EPYC 7R13 and the Ice Lake 8375C support NVMe storage, but the EPYC 7R13 has more PCIe lanes available for NVMe devices.
3. What is the difference between the EPYC 7R13 and the EPYC 7R12?
The EPYC 7R13 is a newer generation processor with a higher core count, higher clock speeds, and larger cache size compared to the EPYC 7R12.
