What To Know
- On the other hand, the Intel Xeon Platinum 8358 is based on the Cooper Lake architecture, built on a 14nm process.
- The AMD EPYC 7J13 has a TDP of 225W, while the Intel Xeon Platinum 8358 has a TDP of 250W.
- The choice between the AMD EPYC 7J13 and Intel Xeon Platinum 8358 ultimately depends on the specific requirements of the workload.
The realm of enterprise computing is witnessing an intense rivalry between two industry giants: AMD and Intel. Their latest offerings, the AMD EPYC 7J13 and Intel Xeon Platinum 8358, are pushing the boundaries of server performance. In this comprehensive analysis, we will delve into the specifications, capabilities, and benchmarks of these formidable processors to determine which reigns supreme in the battle of the titans.
Specifications
| Feature | AMD EPYC 7J13 | Intel Xeon Platinum 8358 |
| — | — | — |
| Cores | 32 | 32 |
| Threads | 64 | 64 |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| TDP | 225W | 250W |
| Socket | SP3 | LGA 3647 |
Architecture
The AMD EPYC 7J13 employs Zen 2 architecture, featuring 7nm manufacturing technology and a modular Infinity Fabric architecture. This design allows for high core counts and improved memory bandwidth.
On the other hand, the Intel Xeon Platinum 8358 is based on the Cooper Lake architecture, built on a 14nm process. It utilizes a mesh topology for inter-core communication, providing increased cache coherency and latency reduction.
Performance
In terms of performance, both processors deliver exceptional results. The AMD EPYC 7J13 excels in single-threaded workloads, while the Intel Xeon Platinum 8358 performs better in multi-threaded applications.
SPECint2017 Base
| Processor | Score |
| — | — |
| AMD EPYC 7J13 | 133 |
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8358 | 128 |
SPECfp2017 Base
| Processor | Score |
| — | — |
| AMD EPYC 7J13 | 120 |
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8358 | 125 |
Memory and I/O
The AMD EPYC 7J13 supports up to 2TB of DDR4-3200 memory, while the Intel Xeon Platinum 8358 supports up to 1TB of DDR4-2933 memory. Both processors offer a range of I/O options, including PCIe 4.0 and 3.0 slots.
Power Consumption
The AMD EPYC 7J13 has a TDP of 225W, while the Intel Xeon Platinum 8358 has a TDP of 250W. This difference can be significant in high-density server environments.
Price
The AMD EPYC 7J13 is priced at approximately $1,400, while the Intel Xeon Platinum 8358 is priced at approximately $2,500. The price difference may be a deciding factor for budget-conscious buyers.
Use Cases
The AMD EPYC 7J13 is ideal for applications that demand high single-threaded performance, such as database servers, web servers, and virtualized environments.
The Intel Xeon Platinum 8358 is better suited for workloads that require high multi-threaded performance, such as scientific simulations, machine learning, and data analytics.
Wrap-Up: Choosing the Right Titan
The choice between the AMD EPYC 7J13 and Intel Xeon Platinum 8358 ultimately depends on the specific requirements of the workload. If single-threaded performance and cost-effectiveness are paramount, the AMD EPYC 7J13 is the better option. If multi-threaded performance and advanced features are desired, the Intel Xeon Platinum 8358 is the superior choice.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Which processor is better for gaming?
A: Neither the AMD EPYC 7J13 nor Intel Xeon Platinum 8358 is suitable for gaming. They are designed for enterprise computing applications.
Q: Which processor has the highest core count?
A: Both the AMD EPYC 7J13 and Intel Xeon Platinum 8358 have 32 cores.
Q: Which processor is more energy-efficient?
A: The AMD EPYC 7J13 has a lower TDP (225W) than the Intel Xeon Platinum 8358 (250W).
