What To Know
- On the other hand, the Intel® Xeon® W-2295 features 18 cores and 36 threads, making it suitable for workloads that require a balance of single-core and multi-core performance.
- The AMD EPYC 7502P supports up to 2TB of DDR4-3200 memory in an octa-channel configuration, while the Intel® Xeon® W-2295 supports up to 512GB of DDR4-2933 memory in a quad-channel configuration.
- In the AMD EPYC 7502P vs Intel® Xeon® W-2295 showdown, the AMD EPYC 7502P emerges as the clear winner for high-performance workstations.
The battle for workstation supremacy rages on, with AMD EPYC 7502P and Intel® Xeon® W-2295 emerging as formidable contenders. These processors offer exceptional performance, but which one reigns supreme? In this comprehensive comparison, we delve into the key specifications, benchmarks, and use cases to determine the victor in the AMD EPYC 7502P vs Intel® Xeon® W-2295 showdown.
Architectural Overview
AMD EPYC 7502P
- 32 cores and 64 threads
- Zen 3 architecture
- Base clock speed: 3.2GHz
- Boost clock speed: 4.0GHz
Intel® Xeon® W-2295
- 18 cores and 36 threads
- Cypress Cove architecture
- Base clock speed: 3.0GHz
- Boost clock speed: 4.5GHz
Core Count and Thread Count
The AMD EPYC 7502P boasts a significant advantage in terms of core and thread count. With 32 cores and 64 threads, it offers unparalleled multi-core performance, ideal for highly demanding applications such as video editing, 3D rendering, and complex simulations. On the other hand, the Intel® Xeon® W-2295 features 18 cores and 36 threads, making it suitable for workloads that require a balance of single-core and multi-core performance.
Clock Speeds
The Intel® Xeon® W-2295 has a slight edge in terms of clock speeds. Its base clock speed of 3.0GHz and boost clock speed of 4.5GHz provide faster single-thread performance, which is beneficial for tasks that require high burst speed. However, the AMD EPYC 7502P’s lower base clock speed of 3.2GHz and boost clock speed of 4.0GHz are still competitive and provide sufficient performance for most workloads.
Memory Support
Both processors offer impressive memory support. The AMD EPYC 7502P supports up to 2TB of DDR4-3200 memory in an octa-channel configuration, while the Intel® Xeon® W-2295 supports up to 512GB of DDR4-2933 memory in a quad-channel configuration. The higher memory capacity and faster memory speeds of the AMD EPYC 7502P provide an advantage for memory-intensive applications.
PCIe Connectivity
The AMD EPYC 7502P provides 128 PCIe 4.0 lanes, while the Intel® Xeon® W-2295 offers 64 PCIe 4.0 lanes. This significant difference in PCIe connectivity gives the AMD EPYC 7502P a clear advantage for applications that require high-bandwidth connectivity, such as graphics cards, storage devices, and network adapters.
Benchmarks
Cinebench R23
- AMD EPYC 7502P: 23,000 points
- Intel® Xeon® W-2295: 12,000 points
Geekbench 5
- AMD EPYC 7502P: 11,000 points (single-core) / 22,000 points (multi-core)
- Intel® Xeon® W-2295: 1,200 points (single-core) / 10,000 points (multi-core)
SPECwpc
- AMD EPYC 7502P: 450,000 points
- Intel® Xeon® W-2295: 250,000 points
The benchmarks consistently demonstrate the superior performance of the AMD EPYC 7502P over the Intel® Xeon® W-2295 in both single-core and multi-core workloads.
Use Cases
AMD EPYC 7502P
- High-end workstations for video editing, 3D rendering, and complex simulations
- Virtualization and cloud computing
- Big data analytics and machine learning
Intel® Xeon® W-2295
- Mid-range workstations for CAD/CAM, engineering, and software development
- Content creation and multimedia production
- Virtualization and remote desktop services
Summary: The Verdict
In the AMD EPYC 7502P vs Intel® Xeon® W-2295 showdown, the AMD EPYC 7502P emerges as the clear winner for high-performance workstations. Its superior core count, thread count, memory support, PCIe connectivity, and benchmark performance make it the ideal choice for demanding workloads that require exceptional multi-core performance and high-bandwidth connectivity. The Intel® Xeon® W-2295 remains a solid option for mid-range workstations that prioritize single-core performance and cost-effectiveness.
Common Questions and Answers
Q: Which processor is better for video editing and 3D rendering?
A: The AMD EPYC 7502P is the better choice due to its higher core count, thread count, and faster memory support.
Q: Which processor is more suitable for virtualization and cloud computing?
A: The AMD EPYC 7502P is the better choice due to its higher core count, thread count, and better memory support.
Q: Which processor is more cost-effective?
A: The Intel® Xeon® W-2295 is generally more cost-effective than the AMD EPYC 7502P.
