What To Know
- The EPYC 7452 has a thermal design power (TDP) of 180 watts, while the Xeon E5-2673 v4 has a TDP of 145 watts.
- Choosing between the AMD EPYC 7452 and the Intel Xeon E5-2673 v4 depends on the unique requirements of your application and environment.
- The Xeon E5-2673 v4 has a slightly higher base and turbo boost clock speed, which can provide a performance advantage in single-threaded applications.
In the realm of enterprise computing, choosing the right server processor is paramount for achieving optimal performance and efficiency. Two prominent contenders in this space are the AMD EPYC 7452 and the Intel Xeon E5-2673 v4. This comprehensive comparison delves into the key differences between these two processors, empowering you to make an informed decision for your specific requirements.
Core Count and Thread Count
The AMD EPYC 7452 boasts an impressive 32 cores and 64 threads, while the Intel Xeon E5-2673 v4 features 12 cores and 24 threads. This substantial difference in core count and thread count significantly impacts the processing power of each processor.
Clock Speed
The EPYC 7452 operates at a base clock speed of 2.3 GHz and can turbo boost up to 3.3 GHz. The Xeon E5-2673 v4 has a slightly higher base clock speed of 2.4 GHz and a turbo boost speed of 3.2 GHz. While the difference in clock speed is relatively small, it can impact performance in certain workloads.
Cache Size
Cache size plays a crucial role in processor performance by storing frequently accessed data closer to the cores. The EPYC 7452 has a large 128 MB of L3 cache, while the Xeon E5-2673 v4 has 30 MB of L3 cache. This significant difference in cache size can provide a performance advantage for applications that heavily utilize caching.
Memory Support
The EPYC 7452 supports up to 1 TB of DDR4 memory, while the Xeon E5-2673 v4 supports up to 768 GB of DDR4 memory. This difference in memory capacity can be a limiting factor for applications that require large memory footprints.
Power Consumption
Power consumption is an important consideration for enterprise environments. The EPYC 7452 has a thermal design power (TDP) of 180 watts, while the Xeon E5-2673 v4 has a TDP of 145 watts. The lower TDP of the Xeon E5-2673 v4 can result in lower energy costs.
Price
Pricing is a significant factor when selecting a processor. The EPYC 7452 typically retails for around $2,000, while the Xeon E5-2673 v4 is priced around $1,500. The price difference should be considered in conjunction with the performance and features offered by each processor.
Applications and Workloads
The ideal processor for your application depends on its specific requirements. The EPYC 7452 is well-suited for workloads that require high core counts and large memory capacities, such as virtualization, database management, and scientific computing. The Xeon E5-2673 v4 is a more cost-effective option for workloads that do not require as much processing power, such as file serving and web hosting.
The Verdict
Choosing between the AMD EPYC 7452 and the Intel Xeon E5-2673 v4 depends on the unique requirements of your application and environment. If you need a processor with the highest core count, thread count, and cache size, the EPYC 7452 is the clear choice. However, if you prioritize power efficiency and cost-effectiveness, the Xeon E5-2673 v4 offers a compelling option.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Which processor is better for gaming?
A: Neither the EPYC 7452 nor the Xeon E5-2673 v4 is designed specifically for gaming. They are intended for enterprise computing workloads.
Q: Which processor has better single-core performance?
A: The Xeon E5-2673 v4 has a slightly higher base and turbo boost clock speed, which can provide a performance advantage in single-threaded applications.
Q: Which processor is more future-proof?
A: The EPYC 7452 supports the latest DDR4 memory technology and has a larger L3 cache, which may provide a longer lifespan for your investment.
