What To Know
- The Sandisk Ultra 3D SSD boasts an impressive endurance rating of 200TBW, while the Samsung 860 EVO offers a slightly higher 240TBW.
- The Sandisk Ultra 3D SSD features a 512MB DRAM cache, while the Samsung 860 EVO offers a larger 1GB DRAM cache.
- The Sandisk Ultra 3D SSD offers impressive performance and endurance at a slightly lower price point, while the Samsung 860 EVO provides a larger cache and greater flexibility with its M.
With the ever-increasing demand for storage space, solid-state drives (SSDs) have become a mainstay in modern computing. Among the budget-friendly options, the Sandisk Ultra 3D SSD 1TB and the Samsung 860 EVO are two of the most popular choices. But which one reigns supreme? Let’s delve into a comprehensive comparison to find out.
Capacity and Performance
Both the Sandisk Ultra 3D SSD and the Samsung 860 EVO offer a generous 1TB of storage capacity. In terms of performance, the 860 EVO has a slight edge with sequential read and write speeds of up to 550MB/s and 520MB/s, respectively. The Sandisk Ultra 3D SSD, on the other hand, offers speeds of up to 560MB/s and 530MB/s.
Endurance and Reliability
Endurance refers to the number of times data can be written to and erased on an SSD before it fails. The Sandisk Ultra 3D SSD boasts an impressive endurance rating of 200TBW, while the Samsung 860 EVO offers a slightly higher 240TBW. This indicates that both drives are highly durable and can handle heavy workloads.
Form Factor and Interface
The Sandisk Ultra 3D SSD comes in the standard 2.5-inch form factor, making it compatible with most laptops and desktops. The Samsung 860 EVO, however, offers both 2.5-inch and M.2 form factors, providing greater flexibility for smaller or more compact devices. Both drives utilize the SATA III interface, which is widely supported.
Cache and DRAM
Cache refers to a small amount of high-speed memory that stores frequently accessed data. The Sandisk Ultra 3D SSD features a 512MB DRAM cache, while the Samsung 860 EVO offers a larger 1GB DRAM cache. A larger cache can improve performance, especially for demanding applications.
Price and Value
The Sandisk Ultra 3D SSD typically retails for around $100, while the Samsung 860 EVO is slightly more expensive at around $120. Both drives offer excellent value for their respective price points. However, the Samsung 860 EVO’s higher endurance rating and larger cache may justify the slightly higher cost for users who require extra durability or performance.
Conclusion: The Verdict
Both the Sandisk Ultra 3D SSD and the Samsung 860 EVO are excellent budget-friendly SSDs. The Sandisk Ultra 3D SSD offers impressive performance and endurance at a slightly lower price point, while the Samsung 860 EVO provides a larger cache and greater flexibility with its M.2 form factor option. Ultimately, the best choice depends on your specific needs and preferences.
FAQ
Q: Which SSD is faster, the Sandisk Ultra 3D SSD or the Samsung 860 EVO?
A: The Samsung 860 EVO has slightly faster sequential read and write speeds.
Q: Which SSD is more durable, the Sandisk Ultra 3D SSD or the Samsung 860 EVO?
A: Both drives offer excellent durability, but the Samsung 860 EVO has a slightly higher endurance rating.
Q: Which SSD is better for gaming, the Sandisk Ultra 3D SSD or the Samsung 860 EVO?
A: Both drives are suitable for gaming, but the Samsung 860 EVO’s larger cache and slightly faster speeds may provide a slight advantage.
Q: Which SSD is better for video editing, the Sandisk Ultra 3D SSD or the Samsung 860 EVO?
A: For demanding applications like video editing, the Samsung 860 EVO’s larger cache and higher endurance rating make it a better choice.
Q: Which SSD is better for laptops, the Sandisk Ultra 3D SSD or the Samsung 860 EVO?
A: Both drives are compatible with laptops, but the Sandisk Ultra 3D SSD’s standard 2.5-inch form factor makes it more suitable for older or thicker laptops.
