What To Know
- The BenQ Zowie XL2546K boasts an impressive 240Hz refresh rate and a 1ms response time, while the ASUS PG259QN offers a slightly higher 360Hz refresh rate and a 0.
- The ASUS PG259QN also offers a range of features, including a built-in NVIDIA Reflex Latency Analyzer to measure system latency, a customizable RGB lighting system, and a swivel, tilt, and height-adjustable stand.
- The ASUS PG259QN has a more comprehensive feature set, including a built-in NVIDIA Reflex Latency Analyzer, a customizable RGB lighting system, and a USB-C port.
The pursuit of the ultimate gaming experience demands a monitor that meets the exacting demands of competitive gaming. In this battle of the titans, we pit the BenQ Zowie XL2546K against the ASUS PG259QN, two monitors that boast exceptional performance and features tailored for esports enthusiasts.
Panel and Resolution
Both monitors feature a 24.5-inch TN panel with a resolution of 1920 x 1080. TN panels are known for their lightning-fast response times, making them ideal for fast-paced shooters and competitive games where split-second reactions are crucial.
Refresh Rate and Response Time
The BenQ Zowie XL2546K boasts an impressive 240Hz refresh rate and a 1ms response time, while the ASUS PG259QN offers a slightly higher 360Hz refresh rate and a 0.5ms response time. A higher refresh rate ensures smoother gameplay and reduces motion blur, while a faster response time eliminates ghosting and ensures crisp, precise visuals.
Color Performance
While color accuracy is not typically a top priority for competitive gaming monitors, both the BenQ Zowie XL2546K and ASUS PG259QN offer decent color performance. The Zowie XL2546K covers 99% of the sRGB color space, while the PG259QN covers 99% of the DCI-P3 color space. This means that both monitors can display a wide range of colors without sacrificing accuracy.
Features and Ergonomics
The BenQ Zowie XL2546K is equipped with a host of features designed to enhance the competitive gaming experience. These include a built-in S-Switch for quick profile switching, a detachable height-adjustable stand, and a customizable black equalizer that allows you to fine-tune the darkness of shadows for better visibility in dimly lit game environments.
The ASUS PG259QN also offers a range of features, including a built-in NVIDIA Reflex Latency Analyzer to measure system latency, a customizable RGB lighting system, and a swivel, tilt, and height-adjustable stand.
Connectivity and Compatibility
Both monitors offer a wide range of connectivity options, including DisplayPort 1.4, HDMI 2.0, and USB 3.0. The BenQ Zowie XL2546K also includes a DVI-D port, while the ASUS PG259QN has a USB-C port. Both monitors are compatible with NVIDIA G-Sync and AMD FreeSync Premium Pro technologies for smooth, tear-free gameplay.
Price and Availability
The BenQ Zowie XL2546K is currently priced at around $499, while the ASUS PG259QN is slightly more expensive at around $599. Both monitors are widely available from major retailers and online stores.
Conclusion: The Best Choice for Competitive Gaming
Choosing between the BenQ Zowie XL2546K and ASUS PG259QN ultimately depends on your specific needs and preferences. If you value lightning-fast response times and a wide range of features tailored for competitive gaming, the BenQ Zowie XL2546K is an excellent choice. However, if you prefer a slightly higher refresh rate and a more comprehensive feature set, the ASUS PG259QN is the better option.
Questions We Hear a Lot
1. Which monitor has a faster response time?
The ASUS PG259QN has a slightly faster response time of 0.5ms, while the BenQ Zowie XL2546K has a response time of 1ms.
2. Which monitor has a wider color gamut?
The ASUS PG259QN covers 99% of the DCI-P3 color space, while the BenQ Zowie XL2546K covers 99% of the sRGB color space.
3. Which monitor has more features?
The ASUS PG259QN has a more comprehensive feature set, including a built-in NVIDIA Reflex Latency Analyzer, a customizable RGB lighting system, and a USB-C port.
