What To Know
- If you’re looking for a budget-friendly processor that is energy-efficient and has long battery life, the Intel Celeron N4020 is a good option.
- However, if you need a more powerful processor for multitasking and running demanding applications, the AMD Ryzen 3 3250U is a better choice.
- The Celeron N4020 is more energy-efficient and has longer battery life, while the Ryzen 3 3250U is more powerful and better suited for multitasking and demanding applications.
When shopping for budget laptops, two of the most common processor options are the Intel Celeron N4020 and the AMD Ryzen 3 3250U. Both processors offer decent performance for basic computing tasks, but there are some key differences between them. In this blog post, we’ll provide a comprehensive comparison of the Intel Celeron N4020 vs AMD Ryzen 3 3250U, covering their specifications, performance, battery life, and more.
Architecture and Specifications
The Intel Celeron N4020 is a dual-core processor based on the Gemini Lake Refresh architecture. It has a base clock speed of 1.1 GHz and a turbo boost speed of 2.8 GHz. The AMD Ryzen 3 3250U, on the other hand, is a quad-core processor based on the Zen+ architecture. It has a base clock speed of 2.6 GHz and a turbo boost speed of 3.5 GHz.
Performance Comparison
In terms of performance, the AMD Ryzen 3 3250U is generally faster than the Intel Celeron N4020. This is due to its higher core count and clock speeds. The Ryzen 3 3250U is better suited for multitasking and running more demanding applications.
However, the Intel Celeron N4020 is more energy-efficient than the Ryzen 3 3250U. This is because it is based on a lower-power architecture. As a result, laptops with the Celeron N4020 typically have longer battery life than laptops with the Ryzen 3 3250U.
Graphics Performance
Both the Intel Celeron N4020 and the AMD Ryzen 3 3250U have integrated graphics processors. The Celeron N4020 has an Intel UHD Graphics 600 GPU, while the Ryzen 3 3250U has an AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 GPU.
The Radeon RX Vega 3 GPU is generally more powerful than the UHD Graphics 600 GPU. This means that the Ryzen 3 3250U is better suited for gaming and other graphics-intensive tasks.
Battery Life
As mentioned earlier, the Intel Celeron N4020 is more energy-efficient than the AMD Ryzen 3 3250U. This means that laptops with the Celeron N4020 typically have longer battery life than laptops with the Ryzen 3 3250U.
Price
The Intel Celeron N4020 is typically less expensive than the AMD Ryzen 3 3250U. This is because it is a lower-power processor with fewer cores.
Which Processor is Right for You?
The best processor for you depends on your specific needs. If you’re looking for a budget-friendly processor that is energy-efficient and has long battery life, the Intel Celeron N4020 is a good option. However, if you need a more powerful processor for multitasking and running demanding applications, the AMD Ryzen 3 3250U is a better choice.
The Bottom Line: Intel Celeron N4020 vs AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
The Intel Celeron N4020 and the AMD Ryzen 3 3250U are both good budget-friendly processors for laptops. The Celeron N4020 is more energy-efficient and has longer battery life, while the Ryzen 3 3250U is more powerful and better suited for multitasking and demanding applications. Ultimately, the best processor for you depends on your specific needs and budget.
What People Want to Know
Q: Which processor is better for gaming?
A: The AMD Ryzen 3 3250U is better for gaming than the Intel Celeron N4020.
Q: Which processor is more energy-efficient?
A: The Intel Celeron N4020 is more energy-efficient than the AMD Ryzen 3 3250U.
Q: Which processor is less expensive?
A: The Intel Celeron N4020 is typically less expensive than the AMD Ryzen 3 3250U.
