What To Know
- The FX-4350 is a member of the older Vishera family, while the Ryzen 3 3200U belongs to the newer Zen+ architecture.
- The AMD FX-4350 has a thermal design power (TDP) of 125W, while the Ryzen 3 3200U has a TDP of 15W.
- This means that the Ryzen 3 3200U is much more power-efficient than the FX-4350, making it a better choice for laptops and other portable devices.
The AMD FX-4350 and Ryzen 3 3200U are two processors from different generations of AMD’s CPU lineup. The FX-4350 is a member of the older Vishera family, while the Ryzen 3 3200U belongs to the newer Zen+ architecture. In this blog post, we will compare these two CPUs in various aspects to help you make an informed decision when choosing a processor for your system.
Architecture and Technology:
The AMD FX-4350 is based on the Vishera architecture, which was introduced in 2012. It features a 32nm manufacturing process and has a quad-core design with four integer cores and four floating-point cores. The Ryzen 3 3200U, on the other hand, is based on the Zen+ architecture, which was released in 2018. It utilizes a 14nm manufacturing process and has a dual-core, quad-thread design with Simultaneous Multithreading (SMT).
Clock Speed and Cache:
The AMD FX-4350 has a base clock speed of 4.2 GHz and a turbo boost speed of 4.3 GHz. It comes with 4MB of L2 cache and 8MB of L3 cache. The Ryzen 3 3200U has a base clock speed of 2.6 GHz and a boost speed of 3.5 GHz. It features 512KB of L2 cache and 4MB of L3 cache.
Performance:
In terms of performance, the Ryzen 3 3200U outperforms the AMD FX-4350 in most tasks. The Zen+ architecture and SMT provide the Ryzen 3 3200U with a significant advantage in single-threaded and multi-threaded applications. However, the FX-4350 may still perform better in heavily multi-threaded workloads that can fully utilize its four integer cores.
Power Consumption and Efficiency:
The AMD FX-4350 has a thermal design power (TDP) of 125W, while the Ryzen 3 3200U has a TDP of 15W. This means that the Ryzen 3 3200U is much more power-efficient than the FX-4350, making it a better choice for laptops and other portable devices.
Upgradability and Compatibility:
The AMD FX-4350 is compatible with the AM3+ socket, while the Ryzen 3 3200U uses the FP5 socket. This means that you will need a different motherboard to upgrade to either of these CPUs. Additionally, the FX-4350 supports DDR3 memory, while the Ryzen 3 3200U supports DDR4 memory.
Price and Value:
The AMD FX-4350 is a relatively inexpensive processor, while the Ryzen 3 3200U is priced slightly higher. However, the Ryzen 3 3200U offers significantly better performance and efficiency, making it a better value for money overall.
Wrap-Up:
Overall, the AMD Ryzen 3 3200U is a superior processor to the AMD FX-4350 in almost every aspect. It offers better performance, power efficiency, and value for money. If you are looking for a new processor for your system, we highly recommend the Ryzen 3 3200U over the FX-4350.
Frequently Asked Questions:
Q: Which processor is better for gaming?
A: The Ryzen 3 3200U is better for gaming due to its higher single-threaded performance and SMT support.
Q: Which processor is better for video editing?
A: The Ryzen 3 3200U is better for video editing thanks to its better multi-threaded performance and support for faster DDR4 memory.
Q: Which processor is more energy-efficient?
A: The Ryzen 3 3200U is significantly more energy-efficient than the FX-4350 due to its lower TDP and more advanced manufacturing process.
