What To Know
- The Atom X5-Z8350 is built on a 14nm process, while the Celeron N3350 utilizes a 28nm process.
- The smaller process size of the Atom X5-Z8350 contributes to its improved power efficiency, making it a better choice for devices with limited battery life.
- The Atom X5-Z8350 is typically priced lower than the Celeron N3350, making it a more affordable option for those on a tight budget.
In the realm of budget-friendly computing, two processors stand out as formidable contenders: the Intel Celeron N3350 and the Atom X5-Z8350. Both processors offer a balance of affordability and performance, making them ideal for students, casual users, and those seeking a reliable device for basic tasks. In this comprehensive comparison, we delve into the key differences between these two processors to help you make an informed decision.
Performance: Celeron N3350 Takes the Lead
The Celeron N3350 boasts a higher clock speed of 1.1 GHz, compared to the Atom X5-Z8350’s 1.44 GHz. This slight difference in frequency translates into a noticeable performance advantage for the Celeron N3350, particularly in single-threaded applications. However, the Atom X5-Z8350’s quad-core configuration gives it an edge in multi-threaded tasks.
Architecture: Atom X5-Z8350’s Power Efficiency
The Atom X5-Z8350 is built on a 14nm process, while the Celeron N3350 utilizes a 28nm process. The smaller process size of the Atom X5-Z8350 contributes to its improved power efficiency, making it a better choice for devices with limited battery life.
Graphics: Celeron N3350’s Superior Visuals
Both processors feature integrated graphics, but the Celeron N3350’s Intel HD Graphics 500 is more powerful than the Atom X5-Z8350’s Intel HD Graphics. This difference is noticeable in games and video playback, where the Celeron N3350 provides smoother and more enjoyable visuals.
Connectivity: Atom X5-Z8350’s Wider Options
The Atom X5-Z8350 offers a wider range of connectivity options, including support for Bluetooth 4.2, Wi-Fi 802.11ac, and a Mini DisplayPort. The Celeron N3350, on the other hand, supports Bluetooth 4.0 and Wi-Fi 802.11n, which may limit its compatibility with certain devices and networks.
Compatibility: Celeron N3350’s Broader Support
The Celeron N3350 supports a wider range of operating systems, including Windows 10, Linux, and Chrome OS. The Atom X5-Z8350, on the other hand, is primarily designed for Windows 10 and may not be compatible with other operating systems.
Price: Atom X5-Z8350’s Budget-Friendly Edge
The Atom X5-Z8350 is typically priced lower than the Celeron N3350, making it a more affordable option for those on a tight budget. However, the price difference may not be significant enough to outweigh the performance advantages of the Celeron N3350.
Which Processor is Right for You?
The choice between the Intel Celeron N3350 and the Atom X5-Z8350 depends on your specific needs and preferences.
- For users who prioritize performance and visual quality, the Celeron N3350 is the better choice.
- For users who value power efficiency, connectivity options, and affordability, the Atom X5-Z8350 is a solid option.
The Verdict: A Balanced Choice
Both the Intel Celeron N3350 and the Atom X5-Z8350 offer compelling features at a budget-friendly price. The Celeron N3350 provides a noticeable performance advantage, while the Atom X5-Z8350 boasts improved power efficiency and connectivity options. Ultimately, the best choice depends on your individual priorities and budget constraints.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Which processor has better battery life?
A: The Atom X5-Z8350 is more power-efficient than the Celeron N3350, resulting in longer battery life.
Q: Can I play games on these processors?
A: Yes, but don’t expect high frame rates. The Celeron N3350’s superior graphics performance makes it better suited for casual gaming.
Q: Which processor is better for multitasking?
A: The Atom X5-Z8350’s quad-core configuration gives it an edge in multi-threaded tasks, making it better for multitasking.
Q: Can I upgrade these processors in the future?
A: No, these processors are typically soldered onto the motherboard and cannot be upgraded.
Q: Which processor is better for video editing?
A: The Celeron N3350’s improved graphics performance makes it a better choice for basic video editing.
