What To Know
- With a TDP of 6W, the Intel Celeron N4000 consumes more power than the Atom x5-Z8350, which has a TDP of 2W.
- Due to its lower power consumption, the Atom x5-Z8350 is more suitable for portable devices where battery life is a priority.
- The choice between the Intel Celeron N4000 and the Atom x5-Z8350 depends on the intended use case and priorities.
In the realm of budget-friendly processors, two key contenders emerge: the Intel Celeron N4000 and the Atom x5-Z8350. Both chips offer affordable options for entry-level laptops, tablets, and other devices. However, understanding their respective strengths and weaknesses is crucial before making an informed purchase. This comprehensive guide will delve into a detailed comparison of the Intel Celeron N4000 vs. Atom x5-Z8350, analyzing their specifications, performance, and suitability for various use cases.
Specifications
Intel Celeron N4000
- Architecture: Gemini Lake Refresh
- Cores: 4
- Threads: 4
- Clock Speed: 1.1 GHz (base) to 2.6 GHz (turbo)
- L2 Cache: 4 MB
- TDP: 6W
Atom x5-Z8350
- Architecture: Cherry Trail
- Cores: 4
- Threads: 4
- Clock Speed: 1.44 GHz (base) to 1.92 GHz (turbo)
- L2 Cache: 2 MB
- TDP: 2W
Performance
CPU Benchmark
In Geekbench 5’s single-core test, the Intel Celeron N4000 scores an average of 650 points, while the Atom x5-Z8350 scores around 500 points. In the multi-core test, the N4000 achieves an average of 1600 points, significantly outperforming the x5-Z8350’s score of 1000 points.
Graphics Benchmark
Using 3DMark’s Time Spy benchmark, the Intel Celeron N4000’s integrated UHD Graphics 600 delivers an average score of 250 points, while the Atom x5-Z8350’s HD Graphics 400 scores around 150 points. This indicates a noticeable difference in graphics performance.
Power Consumption
With a TDP of 6W, the Intel Celeron N4000 consumes more power than the Atom x5-Z8350, which has a TDP of 2W. This difference can impact battery life in portable devices.
Suitability for Use Cases
Web Browsing and Office Productivity
Both the Intel Celeron N4000 and the Atom x5-Z8350 can handle basic web browsing, email, and office applications. However, the N4000’s higher performance may provide a smoother experience, especially when multitasking or working with larger files.
Multimedia and Gaming
For multimedia consumption, such as watching videos or listening to music, both chips are sufficient. However, the Atom x5-Z8350’s weaker graphics performance may struggle with more demanding tasks like video editing or playing games.
Portability and Battery Life
Due to its lower power consumption, the Atom x5-Z8350 is more suitable for portable devices where battery life is a priority. The Intel Celeron N4000, on the other hand, is better suited for devices that require more performance.
Summary: Making the Right Choice
The choice between the Intel Celeron N4000 and the Atom x5-Z8350 depends on the intended use case and priorities. For devices that prioritize power efficiency and portability, the Atom x5-Z8350 is a solid option. However, if performance is more critical, the Intel Celeron N4000 offers a noticeable advantage.
Popular Questions
Q: Which processor is better for gaming?
A: The Intel Celeron N4000 has better graphics performance and is more suitable for casual gaming.
Q: Which processor has longer battery life?
A: The Atom x5-Z8350 has a lower power consumption and will provide longer battery life in portable devices.
Q: Is the Intel Celeron N4000 compatible with Windows 11?
A: Yes, the Intel Celeron N4000 is compatible with Windows 11.
Q: Which processor is better for video editing?
A: The Intel Celeron N4000 has better performance and is more suitable for basic video editing tasks.
Q: Is the Atom x5-Z8350 suitable for programming?
A: The Atom x5-Z8350 can handle basic programming tasks but may struggle with more demanding workloads.
